Live data from Hacker News

Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

anthropic.com

101–110 of 519 posts

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#101
post #2

>Higher usage limits >The following three changes—all effective today—are aimed at improving the experience of using Claude for our most dedicated customers. >First, we’re doubling Claude Code’s five-hour rate limits for Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans. >Second, we’re removing the peak hours limit reduction on Claude Code for Pro and Max accounts. >Third, we’re raising our API rate limits considerably…

No I don't ever give up. I would have to be dead or completely incapacitated.

-Elon

https://x.com/XFreeze/status/2012390928221094335

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It makes no sense. We're being presented with a forced choice -- put them in space, or put them in the middle of downtown Seattle. This is stupid. I don't understand what's happening... specifically, what mental virus is spreading that lowers everybody's IQ by 10-20 points, evidently including my own. Put the data centers in the ocean, powered by solar and networked with Starlink or LEO. Put them in the desert. Put t…

Because the US has levied high tariffs on solar cells, can't build their own solar cells economically enough, and has such a torrid permitting system that it can't build transmission lines. Natural gas is the only form of generation that's easy to permit outside cities (due to pipeline agreements and this admin fast-tracking natural gas generation approval) but few cities will allow one. DCs need to be built within l…

What does that have to do with my point? Space-based data centers need solar cells too. They are just like terrestrial data centers, only more expensive. For every dollar you save on the PV array, you'll spend two more on radiators.

And you don't need permits in international waters, any more than you need them in orbit. Lease space on container ships.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because the US has levied high tariffs on solar cells, can't build their own solar cells economically enough, and has such a torrid permitting system that it can't build transmission lines. Natural gas is the only form of generation that's easy to permit outside cities (due to pipeline agreements and this admin fast-tracking natural gas generation approval) but few cities will allow one. DCs need to be built within l…

What does that have to do with my point? Space-based data centers need solar cells too. They are just like terrestrial data centers, only more expensive. For every dollar you save on the PV array, you'll spend two more on radiators. And you don't need permits in international waters, any more than you need them in orbit. Lease space on container ships.

The argument is that it's too hard to gain the necessary approvals on Earth such that space is faster and easier. Not sure I buy it fully (I do see it somewhat), but that's the argument.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#104
post #25

> As part of this agreement, we have also expressed interest in partnering with SpaceX to develop multiple gigawatts of orbital AI compute capacity. Anthropic is either taking this space business more serious than the general public, or posting this sentence was part of the deal to get the compute.

most of the big tech ceos have mentioned this.

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#105
post #36
post #6

They're doubling the five hour limits, but no mention about the weekly limit. So overall it's the same maximum usage, right?

I think so, but that's also really great because I frequently run into the five hour caps, but very rarely use my entire weekly allotment. There are lots of situations where I do things like write the plan for all the work that has to get done, and then set a reminder to execute the plan after I get home, when I'm done making dinner (because e.g. my five hour cap ends at 6pm). Higher caps for the five hour period is…

I (and many others) are the opposite. I run out of quota is 4-5 days. Generally no issues with the 5hr cap. ($200 sub)

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think he's referring to the fact that Colossus is powered by fossil fuels.

literally the entire economy is powered by fossil fuels

As far as electricity goes, the US is currently 50/50 fossil fuels and renewables (solar, wind, etc).

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Building datacenters plays to his strengths. It's a good partnership if he can stomach it.

I would think that stomaching Musk would be the hard part. Just goes to show how compute-constrained Anthropic is at this time. He literally did a Nazi salute on stage, twice! Check the video, and tell me what you see. edit: https://giphy.com/gifs/elon-musk-nazi-salute-8W0ItVv7T1kRdwb...

If it is a Nazi salute, it's a real bad one !

Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One of the reasons I refuse to use xAI’s models is because of the outsized negative environmental impacts of the methane gas turbines. Now I have to avoid Claude too.

If you can make up an inconsequential arbitrary rationalization to not use a service then I’m sure you can do the opposite to convince yourself to use it. That’s what virtue signaling is I guess - the action you’re taking is pointless, the only point is to tell everyone you’re taking it therefore feed the narrative forward? The entire economy runs off gas turbines though this is the thing you boycott?

gas turbines generally are for peaking. Not for base load.

Hopefully Elon lets you into his glass bubble when the s** cooks on the fan.

Post reply on HN