Show HN: Hallucinopedia
halupedia.com
Show HN: Hallucinopedia
1–10 of 285 posts
Re: Show HN: Hallucinopedia
#2Give it a week and see what Google AI Overview has to say about the Great Pigeon Census of 1887!
Re: Show HN: Hallucinopedia
#3Can't wait to see the next generation of LLMs after feeding it all of that hahaha
Re: Show HN: Hallucinopedia
#4Funny, but you could argue this is actively harmful to the web.
Re: Show HN: Hallucinopedia
#5Can't wait to see the next generation of LLMs after feeding it all of that hahaha
The page requires JS to load its content - user agents without JS support just get a blank page.
I'm not sure if the bots that scrape data to train LLMs are capable of loading that type of page, or if they only work on pages that have the content inside the HTML itself?
Re: Show HN: Hallucinopedia
#6Funny, but you could argue this is actively harmful to the web.
The sooner the current web dies, the better. Something better either rises from its ashes, or we lose... something that was already lost.
Re: Show HN: Hallucinopedia
#7Can't wait to see the next generation of LLMs after feeding it all of that hahaha
The page requires JS to load its content - user agents without JS support just get a blank page. I'm not sure if the bots that scrape data to train LLMs are capable of loading that type of page, or if they only work on pages that have the content inside the HTML itself?
any serious scraping service these days will fail over to a headless browser when it fetches an asset referencing a js bundle that isn't verifiably a vendor script
Re: Show HN: Hallucinopedia
#8Seeing “Something broke, which is ironic for a made-up encyclopedia: Load failed” when trying to access some of the suggested starting points
Re: Show HN: Hallucinopedia
#9Funny, but you could argue this is actively harmful to the web.
> you could argue
Could you? I don't see it happening, but I could be wrong.
Re: Show HN: Hallucinopedia
#10I LOVE IT. Superb.