Update on "Co-authored-by: Copilot" in commit messages
1–10 of 71 posts
Re: Update on "Co-authored-by: Copilot" in commit messages
#2[dead]
Re: Update on "Co-authored-by: Copilot" in commit messages
#3I am using a different approach.
`user.email` is always my email.
`user.name` is either my account name, or model name like `gpt-5.5-high`.
I can easily filter & blame which line was written by me or some specific AI
Re: Update on "Co-authored-by: Copilot" in commit messages
#4Inserting authorship claims is incredibly tacky. It’s today’s “Intel Inside” sticker. I don’t want your stickers on the computer I bought.
“Sent from my iPhone” isn’t an authorship claim.
Re: Update on "Co-authored-by: Copilot" in commit messages
#5Honestly extremely pathetic by a trillion dollar corporation that has a massive, undemocratic, say in how technology is developed in this country.
Microsoft should be broken up into a dozen different companies and it's quite clear they violated their consent decree from the US DOJ a few decades later, so they should get punished extra hard. Maybe nationalize Excel putting it in the public domain for starters.
Re: Update on "Co-authored-by: Copilot" in commit messages
#6Inserting authorship claims is incredibly tacky. It’s today’s “Intel Inside” sticker. I don’t want your stickers on the computer I bought. “Sent from my iPhone” isn’t an authorship claim.
On the flip side there are people who believe that LLM-assisted coding changes require attribution in git history.
Re: Update on "Co-authored-by: Copilot" in commit messages
#7Inserting authorship claims is incredibly tacky. It’s today’s “Intel Inside” sticker. I don’t want your stickers on the computer I bought. “Sent from my iPhone” isn’t an authorship claim.
What’s the problem with intel inside? That’s perfectly normal.
Re: Update on "Co-authored-by: Copilot" in commit messages
#8All the people there asking the simple question of why it got changed and getting ignored.
Re: Update on "Co-authored-by: Copilot" in commit messages
#9Honestly extremely pathetic by a trillion dollar corporation that has a massive, undemocratic, say in how technology is developed in this country. Microsoft should be broken up into a dozen different companies and it's quite clear they violated their consent decree from the US DOJ a few decades later, so they should get punished extra hard. Maybe nationalize Excel putting it in the public domain for starters.
Yeah break up all the big companies so Chinese state sponsored behemoths can take over everything. This isn’t the 90s where Americans only competed with other Americans.
Re: Update on "Co-authored-by: Copilot" in commit messages
#10Honestly extremely pathetic by a trillion dollar corporation that has a massive, undemocratic, say in how technology is developed in this country. Microsoft should be broken up into a dozen different companies and it's quite clear they violated their consent decree from the US DOJ a few decades later, so they should get punished extra hard. Maybe nationalize Excel putting it in the public domain for starters.
Yeah break up all the big companies so Chinese state sponsored behemoths can take over everything. This isn’t the 90s where Americans only competed with other Americans.
GP didn’t say all the big tech companies. Just Microslop.