and white supremacists, but not sex workers?
Lol
Why is Cloudflare protecting the DDoS'er (beamed.st) attacking Ubuntu servers?
11–20 of 46 posts
Re: Why is Cloudflare protecting the DDoS'er (beamed.st) attacking Ubuntu servers?
#12Remember that Cloudflare does a MITM on every connection to every website they front. CF not only protects them... they have real time intelligence on who is getting attacked, who is paying for it, and all the parameters of the attack (type, volume, duration, etc). What would your sales team give for leads this hot?
>they have real time intelligence on [...] who is paying for it, This is credible as "amazon has real time intelligence on all their e-commerce competitors because they operate AWS".
It's true though, isn't it.... The question is do they use it?
Re: Why is Cloudflare protecting the DDoS'er (beamed.st) attacking Ubuntu servers?
#13Remember that Cloudflare does a MITM on every connection to every website they front. CF not only protects them... they have real time intelligence on who is getting attacked, who is paying for it, and all the parameters of the attack (type, volume, duration, etc). What would your sales team give for leads this hot?
>they have real time intelligence on [...] who is paying for it, This is credible as "amazon has real time intelligence on all their e-commerce competitors because they operate AWS".
It would be way more complex for AWS to look at data in VM's then for cloudflare to look at unencrypted HTTP traffic. Heck they probably already do for various monitoring.
Re: Why is Cloudflare protecting the DDoS'er (beamed.st) attacking Ubuntu servers?
#14The post seems skip explanation of what Cloudflare's involvement is?
read it. cloudflare hosts the attackers.
Sorry if I wasn't clear, when reading Taggart's post and subsequent chained comments and didn't see any explanation of what Cloudflare's involvement was.
Am I missing something on how to see more of the original post perhaps? As a sanity check I did a ctrl+f on "hosts" on the page and didn't get a match but I suppose that wouldn't help if I'm not in the right place to see the rest of the content.
Re: Why is Cloudflare protecting the DDoS'er (beamed.st) attacking Ubuntu servers?
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
read it. cloudflare hosts the attackers.
>cloudflare hosts the attackers. No, they provide DDoS protection, but the actual servers are likely hosted on some random VPS somewhere.
When I do a lookup on beamed.st I get an IP in 2606:4700::/32 which is currently advertised from AS13335 "Cloudflare, Inc."
Edit: I now realize gruez meant the beamed.st site itself is behind Cloudflare DDoS, completing the loop to explaining what Cloudflare's involvement was :).
Re: Why is Cloudflare protecting the DDoS'er (beamed.st) attacking Ubuntu servers?
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
>they have real time intelligence on [...] who is paying for it, This is credible as "amazon has real time intelligence on all their e-commerce competitors because they operate AWS".
It would be way more complex for AWS to look at data in VM's then for cloudflare to look at unencrypted HTTP traffic. Heck they probably already do for various monitoring.
>It would be way more complex for AWS to look at data in VM's then for cloudflare to look at unencrypted HTTP traffic.
Most enterprises aren't using AWS as a VPS provider. They're going to be using other products like API gateway, ELB, or WAF, all of which expose traffic for easy analysis. Even if for whatever reason they are, the pareto principle applies. They don't need to care about the long tail of e-commerece vendors out there, only the whales. For that, they can just get an intern (or nowadays, LLM) to dump out the disk and manually dissect whatever's on there.
Re: Why is Cloudflare protecting the DDoS'er (beamed.st) attacking Ubuntu servers?
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
>cloudflare hosts the attackers. No, they provide DDoS protection, but the actual servers are likely hosted on some random VPS somewhere.
When I do a lookup on beamed.st I get an IP in 2606:4700::/32 which is currently advertised from AS13335 "Cloudflare, Inc." Edit: I now realize gruez meant the beamed.st site itself is behind Cloudflare DDoS, completing the loop to explaining what Cloudflare's involvement was :).
Yes that looks the same whether they provide DDoS protection or host.
Re: Why is Cloudflare protecting the DDoS'er (beamed.st) attacking Ubuntu servers?
#18[dead]
Re: Why is Cloudflare protecting the DDoS'er (beamed.st) attacking Ubuntu servers?
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
When I do a lookup on beamed.st I get an IP in 2606:4700::/32 which is currently advertised from AS13335 "Cloudflare, Inc." Edit: I now realize gruez meant the beamed.st site itself is behind Cloudflare DDoS, completing the loop to explaining what Cloudflare's involvement was :).
Yes that looks the same whether they provide DDoS protection or host.
Ahhh, I completely misread who the DDoS protection was being provided to. Must be a slow day for me :). Thanks!
Re: Why is Cloudflare protecting the DDoS'er (beamed.st) attacking Ubuntu servers?
#20This is the dumbest post I’ve read. The attackers have a site seemingly hosted by/orange clouded by Cloudflare. They aren’t providing botnet or DDOS capabilities. Cloudflare tries to act as a third party that follows the law when the law gets involved. They don’t want to actively police the internet in the same way they don’t actively abolish piracy (see Anna’s Archive). There are exceptions to this of course, but on average I don’t find it necessary for Cloudflare to knock down the site of the attackers because they sell illegal services. Isn’t this what HN bitches about anyways, CF being a centralised authority? Now you’re bitching that it’s not using its centralisation powers?