Sharing my current MO: I start with a high level design md doc which an AI helps write. Then I ask another AI - whether the same model without the context, or another model - to critique it and spot bugs, gaps and omissions. It always finds obvious in hindsight stuff. So I ask it to summarize its findings and I paste that into the first AI and ask its opinions. We form an agreed change and make it and carry on this a…
How much faster/slower are you with that process compared to writing code yourself?
To get a quality, lasting, result you're ultimately having to carefully study everything otherwise you end up quickly accumulating cognitive debt and the speedup soon shrinks as you're constantly having to revisit the initial approaches.