Over 8M Thermos jars and bottles recalled after 3 people lost vision
101–110 of 115 posts
Re: Over 8M Thermos jars and bottles recalled after 3 people lost vision
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
You have a section of threads that seal or have a gasket. This is simpler than a relief valve that can leak or collect bacteria.
The cap is rigid. Either the threads constrain movement or they don't. A section of threads that allow for movement would still find the overall system constrained by other threading.
Re: Over 8M Thermos jars and bottles recalled after 3 people lost vision
#103Re: Over 8M Thermos jars and bottles recalled after 3 people lost vision
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't the point of a thermos to put "perishable and fermenting foods" in it, like coffee or tea? Like this could totally have been me, like make a thermos-full of coffee one day, then forget about it only to come back to in some weeks just to open it and have one of my eyes blown off
good luck of anything fermenting after dousing with boiling water..
Fermentation is still possible. Likely, even, if slower to start.
Re: Over 8M Thermos jars and bottles recalled after 3 people lost vision
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
not on purpose, I just forget stuff until they rot
Lol. If I forget food in a container and expect that it's rotted, I'm holding it well away from my face when I open it.
Re: Over 8M Thermos jars and bottles recalled after 3 people lost vision
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lol. If I forget food in a container and expect that it's rotted, I'm holding it well away from my face when I open it.
If you expect that it's rotted, you haven't really forgotten it. That's the whole point: they expected empty containers. Which could happen to you, being (presumably) a human.
Re: Over 8M Thermos jars and bottles recalled after 3 people lost vision
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because blinding people is bad and causes expensive lawsuits? How is this even a question.
And you also shouldn't put your dog in the microwave to dry it.
How many people do you think realize that pressure can build up in a thermos if leftover food or drink ferments in it?
And even if you know the danger, how do you know if the thermals bottle you are holding is dangerous or not? Should people call the bomb squad every time they see a thermos with unknown contents inside?
Re: Over 8M Thermos jars and bottles recalled after 3 people lost vision
#108That sucks. I have both and the ones with the pressure relieve valve are a pain in the ass to clean. You have to pull out the rubber inner thingy, you can't get a towel inside the hole that thingy goes into, and in general the rubber thing gets lost easily. I wish Thermos would send me a few of those 8 million stoppers, I'll promise I won't be a dumbass with them :(
> I'll promise I won't be a dumbass with them :( Can you also guarantee with absolute certainty that you'll never forget them anywhere another person who's unaware of the contents or the danger could find them?
Re: Over 8M Thermos jars and bottles recalled after 3 people lost vision
#109That sucks. I have both and the ones with the pressure relieve valve are a pain in the ass to clean. You have to pull out the rubber inner thingy, you can't get a towel inside the hole that thingy goes into, and in general the rubber thing gets lost easily. I wish Thermos would send me a few of those 8 million stoppers, I'll promise I won't be a dumbass with them :(
I wonder if they track how many people are sickened by the difficult-to-clean valve, because I bet it's a lot more than 3. Luckily I got one of the valveless models, and you bet your ass I'm keeping it. Maybe I'll stick an "open away from face" label on top or something, but I'm not about to go increasing my risk of food contamination.
I'd rather they slap a warning on it, like everything else that you can't safely point at your face.
Re: Over 8M Thermos jars and bottles recalled after 3 people lost vision
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you expect that it's rotted, you haven't really forgotten it. That's the whole point: they expected empty containers. Which could happen to you, being (presumably) a human.
I can tell from the weight and feel of the container if it's empty.