Earlier quoted context omitted.
My kneejerk is that most consumers these days expect delivery for items purchased online, and allowing them to pick up their items at a brick and mortar probably isn't the issue. Now, dropping off items you're selling? That probably removes a decent hurdle for many first-time/one-time users who aren't familiar with shipping (what box/label/insurance/padding/...).
> Now, dropping off items you're selling? A place that you could take items and have them packed and shipped for you would remove an enormous hurdle for new eBay sellers. It's easily the most annoying part of the entire process. Hell, maybe they could even list items for people? Like a massive digital pawn shop. I could see this really working out for them if they do it right.
GameStop makes $55.5B takeover offer for eBay
401–410 of 731 posts
Re: GameStop makes $55.5B takeover offer for eBay
#402Earlier quoted context omitted.
Say you take out a mortgage, then rent the house to a series of meth dealers to extract the rent while devaluing the property, and then default: you're still personally on the hook for any post-foreclosure deficiency judgment. One issue with LBOs is that, after extracting cash and fees, PE funds have various ways to extinguish liabilities that individuals don't, both by shielding the PE fund from debts and the use of…
I mean, if I'm allowed to just make up silly hypotheticals, I can easily justify anything. Say I raise money for a friend to buy a house and they proceed to rent it out to meth dealers. The friend is the one on the hook for the loans, of course; but would I not be on the hook for at least a reputation hit such that I can't do that again? Or do we think folks can get away with that sort of poor judgement forever?
Re: GameStop makes $55.5B takeover offer for eBay
#403Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who would down vote this? It’s true. Can people here really not keep their emotions in check enough to admit clearly obvious facts?
The entire conventional zeitgeist is denying plain truths that hurt your self image. It seems consistent that the same thing would happen here.
Re: GameStop makes $55.5B takeover offer for eBay
#404Earlier quoted context omitted.
I try not to use it and then something will come up and I use it. Could be my market, or who knows what but there seems to be more scams. It’s the only place someone can give you a fake tracking number (somehow people get these from UPS) get caught and other than a refund after weeks and a negative reputation ding, they get to keep on doing it. The fake tracking number scam has been going on for years too, it’s still…
I have never had this happen, but I don't buy from first-time eBay sellers. There are definitely scams on there, but they seem to be "too good to be true" prices with 0 reviews on the seller. Surely you're not getting scammed by sellers with lots of reputational history? I actually am more nervous as a seller, as their buyer protection almost always sides with buyers, at least in the US (and the fee is astronomical.)
A refund has been granted but ebay's computers show that someone in my zipcode has also recieved a package (mine should have been 20lbs, the one sent was 2lbs and received by someone with a different name) so I'm kind of expecting a little more drama before it's all said and done. To be fully transparent, it was marked shipped without tracking and has an estimated arrival date of 10 days; after 10 days I asked if it had shipped and was told no and offered a refund and then it became marked shipped with a fake tracking number and "was delivered." The short of it is they're a somewhat prolific seller, I can't think of any reason it issue a fake tracking number and they had my money for about a month. I'm getting the money back but I'm back to square one. The sale at the local store ended.. It's not that big of a deal, just annoying.
It seems like there are sort of 2 classifications of bad experiences. There are poor descriptions, slow transactions, shipping mix-ups, mis-communications and things of that nature. A reputation ding is probably appropriate. Then there are more fraudulent things and ebay has chosen to not really punish those things and let them go, same way Amazon will gladly list and sell fake goods.
Re: GameStop makes $55.5B takeover offer for eBay
#405Earlier quoted context omitted.
The TLDR for people who don't intuitively understand why: existing shareholders are diluting their stake in the company by issuing new shares and getting money for those new shares. It's simply selling part of the company. Not profit.
Worth also pointing out though that if you can sell new shares above intrinsic value that is accretive to existing shareholders. Dilution isn’t always a bad word. (It’s bad for the people buying new shares.)
Re: GameStop makes $55.5B takeover offer for eBay
#406Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cohen is already rich rich, his GameStop compensation doesn’t really matter much. The eBay acquisition could be a strategy to juice his compensation but I think it is much more likely he does believe that he can achieve his stated aims, which will financially benefit him much more in the long term.
> Cohen is already rich rich, his GameStop compensation doesn’t really matter much I think this argument is much stronger in the opposite direction: if his motivations were not focused on accumulating wealth, he’d be retired or running some kind of charity once he was that far past the point where he had to work. The fact that he’s not suggests that he derives his self-identity from wealth and the guys who do that ar…
Re: GameStop makes $55.5B takeover offer for eBay
#407Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are paying half in GameStock equity. They will issue new shares so they will buy Ebay of $55bn, but add only $20bn debt. Its good for GameStock management who will end up running a much bigger business. https://investor.gamestop.com/news-releases/news-details/202... Game Stock management is essentially claiming that they can run Ebay better than the current management so Ebay shareholders will end up better off…
It depends. If Gamestop is able to find the efficiencies that the CEO is claiming, EPS jumps between 50 and 100 percent. Gamestop shareholders get diluted down to owning a smaller piece of a much bigger earnings pie. That's if you don't engage in any conspiracy theories about how many shares retail traders really own (don't go down that rabbit hole). Suffice it to say, the Gamestop's price floor has gone up each time…
its a big promise. Is Ebay really THAT badly run that they can find such efficiencies?
Re: GameStop makes $55.5B takeover offer for eBay
#408Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nintendo CEO cutting his salary in half to avoid firing employees https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/13/nintendo-ceo-once-halved-sal...
Yes and it was 1) incredibly notable, 2) 13 years ago, 3) in another country, and 4) following one of their worst performing products ever. Iwata's (maybe voluntary) temporary pay cut was big news because of how exceptional it was.
Re: GameStop makes $55.5B takeover offer for eBay
#409The original shorting of GameStop back in 2021 gave them a bit of a boost back into the green. While people were doing the GME to the moon, GameStop made more shares to sell, and paid off a bit of its debts, I think it made about a billion dollars in profit, they're still struggling, but it helped prolong their life. A friend of mine also pointed out and this made it click for me that it makes 100% sense, GameStop is…
eBay is dying, new competitors are being created constantly, and the big ones like Poshmark are getting more North American buyers and sellers. eBay has barely grown since their post covid slump Maybe eBay survives as an international site but even at that point, with $20B in debt this will just follow the regular PE playbook of shutting down after many layoffs and pivots The entire concept of, "I have $1,000 in the…
Re: GameStop makes $55.5B takeover offer for eBay
#410Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Banks aren't stupid. Even a cursory familiarity with the history of the industry shows both that this is untrue but also that it’s leaving out many of the core reasons why finance is regulated. Bankers do make mistakes, but also their focus is on what makes them a profit now rather than what’s good for their client or the country long term. The bank does not care if GameStop goes bust as long as that happens after…
> Even a cursory familiarity with the history of the industry shows both that this is untrue The modern trend of believing that “history” is made up of one or two things that everyone saw on the news is actually really entertaining. Definition of “cursory understanding” tbh. The banking industry, historically is far from stupid. This particular story is just basic PR driven market manipulation and has nothing to do w…
It would be useful if you could provide a more detailed version of your argument. I don’t think you seriously believe that banks don’t make mistakes but the way this is written does sound like you’re saying it’s highly unlikely while ignoring the other half of the sentence you quoted.