I think it's a reasonable statue. But does anyone else think it's a bit obvious, more so than his other work? Like there is no doubt on the meaning at all, it's all right there on the surface level.
New statue in London, attributed to Banksy, of a suited man, blinded by a flag
11–20 of 615 posts
Re: New statue in London, attributed to Banksy, of a suited man, blinded by a flag
#12Re: New statue in London, attributed to Banksy, of a suited man, blinded by a flag
#13I think it's a reasonable statue. But does anyone else think it's a bit obvious, more so than his other work? Like there is no doubt on the meaning at all, it's all right there on the surface level.
Re: New statue in London, attributed to Banksy, of a suited man, blinded by a flag
#14Which flag?
Re: New statue in London, attributed to Banksy, of a suited man, blinded by a flag
#15Which flag?
Re: New statue in London, attributed to Banksy, of a suited man, blinded by a flag
#16I think it's a reasonable statue. But does anyone else think it's a bit obvious, more so than his other work? Like there is no doubt on the meaning at all, it's all right there on the surface level.
Which flag? Or, what kind of flag? Or does it matter?
Re: New statue in London, attributed to Banksy, of a suited man, blinded by a flag
#17Re: New statue in London, attributed to Banksy, of a suited man, blinded by a flag
#18I think it's a reasonable statue. But does anyone else think it's a bit obvious, more so than his other work? Like there is no doubt on the meaning at all, it's all right there on the surface level.
Re: New statue in London, attributed to Banksy, of a suited man, blinded by a flag
#19I think it's a reasonable statue. But does anyone else think it's a bit obvious, more so than his other work? Like there is no doubt on the meaning at all, it's all right there on the surface level.
It's also referencing the recent flag controversies in the UK over the past year.
Re: New statue in London, attributed to Banksy, of a suited man, blinded by a flag
#20I think it's a reasonable statue. But does anyone else think it's a bit obvious, more so than his other work? Like there is no doubt on the meaning at all, it's all right there on the surface level.