I suspect there's a second code hidden in there. From the article, describing the code symbols that are Roman letters: These unaccented Roman letters appeared with the frequency you’d expect in a European language. But they don’t represent letters—they mark the spaces between words. It's implausible that these characters just happen to appear with a language-like frequency distribution and are all meaningless spaces.…
It's implausible that these characters just happen to appear with a language-like frequency distribution and are all meaningless spaces Really? If I were to try to pick random letters I suspect I would end up mirroring the frequency that they appeared in English.
They Cracked This 250 Year-Old Code, And Found a Secret Society Inside
21–30 of 39 posts
Re: They Cracked This 250 Year-Old Code, And Found a Secret Society Inside
#22I suspect there's a second code hidden in there. From the article, describing the code symbols that are Roman letters: These unaccented Roman letters appeared with the frequency you’d expect in a European language. But they don’t represent letters—they mark the spaces between words. It's implausible that these characters just happen to appear with a language-like frequency distribution and are all meaningless spaces.…
It's implausible that these characters just happen to appear with a language-like frequency distribution and are all meaningless spaces Really? If I were to try to pick random letters I suspect I would end up mirroring the frequency that they appeared in English.
Humans rather suck at picking random numbers. We skew towards picking numbers that seem "more random", whatever that means (which would probably work in your favour for picking random letters with an English frequency, though I'm not too sure), but we also avoid "randomly" generating streaks of numbers, because we feel those are "less random".
If you put two teams in a room, one flipping a fair coin (and writing down the results), and the other pretending to flip a coin but just faking the results, it is usually very trivial to pick out which team actually flipped the coin. They are going to have surprisingly long streaks of heads or tails.
I don't have any evidence to necessarily suggest it, but I suspect this anti-streak tendency will tend to be strong enough to interfere with any correct frequencies which may otherwise appear. ("Oh my, this is far too many e's in a row..")
Re: They Cracked This 250 Year-Old Code, And Found a Secret Society Inside
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's implausible that these characters just happen to appear with a language-like frequency distribution and are all meaningless spaces Really? If I were to try to pick random letters I suspect I would end up mirroring the frequency that they appeared in English.
Probably not. People are bad at random: http://scienceblogs.com/cognitivedaily/2007/02/05/is-17-the-...
Re: They Cracked This 250 Year-Old Code, And Found a Secret Society Inside
#24And now if only someone cracked the Voynich manuscript!
Re: They Cracked This 250 Year-Old Code, And Found a Secret Society Inside
#25Another poster mentioned the Voynich manuscript. It's available on archive.org if anyone wants to try their hand:
http://archive.org/details/TheVoynichManuscript
Here's a list of others:
Re: They Cracked This 250 Year-Old Code, And Found a Secret Society Inside
#26Re: They Cracked This 250 Year-Old Code, And Found a Secret Society Inside
#27> Eventually we turned to the last items in the Oculist trove: nine copies of a four-page document written in a mixture of old German, Latin, and the Copiale’s coded script. The message was more or less identical in every set. I feel kind of sorry for them, that at the end of their journey they found what was essentially a Rosetta Stone for the code they were decoding.
Re: They Cracked This 250 Year-Old Code, And Found a Secret Society Inside
#28This introduction feels eerily similar to an opening interview at Google.
Re: They Cracked This 250 Year-Old Code, And Found a Secret Society Inside
#29A wonderful read. I know a little bit about frequency analysis and was surprised to see how straightforward its application was (in theory). I'm even more surprised that after a decade of Google, that this approach wouldn't be one of the first things tried out given the length of the text. As the OP describes, it was a chance encounter at a conference that machine learning was finally introduced into the problem. Unt…
>Until that point, the linguist had been trying in vain to decipher the text Well no, the linguist tried in vain to do frequency analysis by hand on ~88 symbols for ~100 pages for a couple months before saying "bugger this for a game of soldiers" and went on with her life. "She tried a few times to catalog the symbols, in hopes of figuring out how often each one appeared. This kind of frequency analysis is one of the…