Live data from Hacker News

VS Code inserting 'Co-Authored-by Copilot' into commits regardless of usage

github.com

81–90 of 917 posts

Re: VS Code inserting 'Co-Authored-by Copilot' into commits regardless of usage

#82

One fascinating thing about the whole AI phenomenon is how incredibly hostile it is to _standards_. Whether something works properly, or is ethical, or is true, no longer matters at all; all that matters is "pls use our AI". Microsoft spent literal decades rehabilitating their reputation. And then set fire to the whole thing in an offering to their robot gods. And it's not just them. There was a time that Google care…

> There was a time that Google cared deeply about UX Have we been using the same Google?

Some people seem to think they cared, at some point. I’m not one of them.

Re: VS Code inserting 'Co-Authored-by Copilot' into commits regardless of usage

#84
This feels like the modern version of 'Sent from my iPhone' but much more invasive. Git commits are legal and technical records. Falsifying who authored a piece of code just to pump up AI usage stats is a huge breach of trust and it is disappointing to see Microsoft prioritize branding over the integrity of the developer's log. I expect my IDE to record what happened, not what the marketing department wants people to think happened.....

Re: VS Code inserting 'Co-Authored-by Copilot' into commits regardless of usage

#85

A lot of bitching about Microsoft here, for something Claude has been doing forever. I have a git hook that rejects any commit containing the line Co-authored by Claude

That's a fair point, but claude code is not an editor (yet?), and when you use claude code, and allow it to commit things, it's almost certainly "co-authored by llm".

Back to vscode, people get the "co-authored" line even if they didn't use the AI features.

Re: VS Code inserting 'Co-Authored-by Copilot' into commits regardless of usage

#86
post #35

Microsoft is such a master class in how to make me hate you, quickly.

I know you didn’t mean it that way, but boy did that make me feel old. Anyone else remember the bill gates borg category on slashdot?

Indeed fellow traveller. I do.

Re: VS Code inserting 'Co-Authored-by Copilot' into commits regardless of usage

#87
post #36
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

However, there's one counterexample: some email clients in the past experienced explosive growth by adding signatures. It was annoying, but it definitely worked.

Someone, somewhere, probably has a "% of commits co-authored by copilot" KPI.

100% hundreds of people do.

Re: VS Code inserting 'Co-Authored-by Copilot' into commits regardless of usage

#88
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's one way that it works, but that's not the main driver. This kind of tagline marketing works best with people people who aren't even aware that they're participating, and who aren't bothered to do anything different it even if they become aware. The juice isn't worth the squeeze, so the marketing remains. Sent from my iPhone Downloaded from Demonoid Rusty n Edie's: The world's friendliest BBS 216-726-0737

But, also, I think in this case, it makes people less likely to use the product, as there's a lot of baggage around agent-written code. People who shouldn't be using it are using it to make so many PRs it's become a DoS attack for some projects, so a lot of project maintainers are rightly sniffy about AI-written code.

I'd like to think that the level of cognitive sophistication necessary to assess the situation negatively would be very widely available. That would be a very pleasant line of thought for me.

But then, I look at the modern-world empires that are built upon advertising and realize that reality just isn't that way. At all.

Re: VS Code inserting 'Co-Authored-by Copilot' into commits regardless of usage

#89
post #50
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Turn it off and rage on social media. If it gets bad enough, look into Zed. Their tagline is literally "your last next editor".

Zed currently does not have a revenue stream. Ot's only a matter of time before the same shenanigans ensue.

Like how GNU Emacs is completely saturated with AI now?

(That's sarcasm, in case anyone wants to pretend I'm being serious.)

Post reply on HN