What does k3k stand for? Can we just put whatever number we want between 2 letters now?
K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
11–20 of 55 posts
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#12What does k3k stand for? Can we just put whatever number we want between 2 letters now?
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#13Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#14What does k3k stand for? Can we just put whatever number we want between 2 letters now?
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#15Do Rancher side products generally make it into a stable state such that you would want to run mission-critical systems on?
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#16Do Rancher side products generally make it into a stable state such that you would want to run mission-critical systems on?
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#17What does k3k stand for? Can we just put whatever number we want between 2 letters now?
It's Kubernetes in Kubernetes and a reference in k3s which is also a project we are heavily contributing to, at SUSE.
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#18I don’t understand how they are separating security in the virtual mode as they only mention pods. It seems every workload still shares the underlying node, even when in virtual mode. Take for example the OCI cache on the nodes. What about cache poisoning?
Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#19Re: K3k: Kubernetes in Kubernetes
#20It’s really exciting to see this on the front page. The project actually started during a SUSE Hackweek by my colleague Hussein. It was initially envisioned as a "Kubernetes version of k3d," but it evolved into something more ambitious and eventually became a real product. We’ve always been big believers in the power of open source. For the current default "shared" mode, we even experimented with Virtual Kubelet, another CNCF project, during our development process.
I’ll be hanging around the thread today, so if you have any questions about the history, the tech stack, or where we're headed next, feel free to ask!