Mistral Medium 3.5
mistral.ai
Mistral Medium 3.5
1–10 of 248 posts
Re: Mistral Medium 3.5
#2I want to believe it's gonna be good, but after trying GPT-5.5 even the most advanced Chinese models seem depressing.
Re: Mistral Medium 3.5
#3I want to believe it's gonna be good, but after trying GPT-5.5 even the most advanced Chinese models seem depressing.
Then you’ll be happy to learn it’s not Chinese
Re: Mistral Medium 3.5
#4I want to believe it's gonna be good, but after trying GPT-5.5 even the most advanced Chinese models seem depressing.
This is a French model sir
Re: Mistral Medium 3.5
#5Looks at first graph. It's SWE-Bench Verified. A benchmark Open-AI stopped using two months ago due to contamination.
Doesn't look to promising. Is there any reason to consider Mistral other than it's not US?
Re: Mistral Medium 3.5
#6TLDR: Mistral Medium 3.5, text-only, 128B dense model, 256k context window, modified MIT license. Model is ~140G ...
https://huggingface.co/mistralai/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B
They more or less claim this exceeds Claude Sonnet 3.5 on most things, but is worse than Sonnet 3.6, and exceeds all other open models.
Oh and they have a cloud service that will code your apps "in the cloud". But, yeah, at this point, so does my cat.
And, yes, unsloth is on it: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B-GGUF (but 4bit quant is 75G)
Re: Mistral Medium 3.5
#7I want to believe it's gonna be good, but after trying GPT-5.5 even the most advanced Chinese models seem depressing.
Then you’ll be happy to learn it’s not Chinese
GP is stating that the second best in the field, the Chinese, is so far behind the best in the field, GPT 5.5, that it is not even worth testing anything else.
Re: Mistral Medium 3.5
#8It's okay, nothing exceptional, but any news from non US and non Chinese models is still good news.