Live data from Hacker News

GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

github.blog

151–160 of 583 posts

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#151

Current multipliers vs from June Opus 4.6 3x -> 27x Opus 4.7 3x -> 27x GPT 5.4 1x -> 6x EDIT: only applies to annual plans

I think that only applies to held-over users on the annual plan: > Users on annual Pro or Pro+ plans will remain on their existing plan with premium request-based pricing until their plan expires, however, model multipliers will increase on June 1 (see table).

There will surely be corresponding, different AI credit costs for each model.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#152
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One theory of the play of SpaceX might do if everyone migrates to query-based billing: Provide cheap and unlimited access to Grok for programmers (hence the Cursor partnership/purchase for distribution). -> This would drag massive revenue right before the IPO announcement, like if the company is super growing -> At a loss, but don't worry, we need these funds to build the biggest datacenter of the universe. This anno…

I don’t get the SpaceX reference. I thought they made rockets?

They now also own xAI

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#153
post #56

How is this legal when people paid for a yearly plan in advance?

In order to most-to-least charitable, any of: 1. Github could choose to grandfather in those plans and make no changes until those plans expire. 2. Github could offer, or the user could request, a pro-rated refund along with cancellation of the account. 3. Tough luck, those users agreed that Github could unilaterally change the ToS at any time.

Right now there is a cancel and refund button on the Github Copilot annual subscription setting, which I have just pressed.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#154
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To anybody who's been watching the tech sector with a critical eye for pretty much any period from the late 90s and onward, this is just the enshittification process. For most of OpenAI's existence it's been obvious, to me, that investors were burning insane levels of capital to build the market, and now that folks are locked in, you're seeing higher fees, ads, etc. Yet again, the user is the product; the investors w…

I'd call it a straight up "bait and switch".

If you paid attention to the power requirements and amount of hardware being put into data centers, you should have realized that it cost them an order of magnitude more than you were being charged. To rework your analogy: they hooked you, now they're gonna see if they can reel you in.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#156
post #95
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seems like a strong signal the money burning party is coming to a close. Nearly all AI companies have tightened their belts in the past month. Anthropic removed Claude Code from the Pro plan, Z.AI increased their prices, GitHub removed some Claude models from Copilot, now this. Also, Opus 4.7 seems like a model more intended to save Anthropic money than push the bar.

I believe Anthropic added CC back to the pro plan.

the point is that they tipped their hand about where they want to go in the future. They are just A B testing to see how much it pissed off their customers

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#157
Everybody who says it's a 5-9-27x seems to not be aware of the obvious loophole. More like 50x increase. You were able to use over $500 worth of Opus on a $10/mo Github plan easily, no hacks. You could just prompt "plan this out for me, don't stop until fully planned, don't ask any questions", and you would get ~$5 worth of planning in one 3x request. At 100 requests/mo, each easily reaching $5, that's easy $500 worth of tokens.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#158
post #25

I was curious why a company would still use the VS Code + Copilot sidebar method for coding, rather than something like Claude Code. Turns out there’s a GitHub Copilot CLI! I thought I was pretty familiar with available options, but no one in my circles ever mentions this product. It doesn’t seem to have much mindshare. Has anyone used it? What’s your experience? https://github.com/features/copilot/cli

I’m actually trying to move back from the Claude Code style, I feel like it’s easy to become distant from your own code, and I am feeling uncomfortable with that.

I’ve “vibe-coded” some projects and when I start to find issues or go to refactor them I don’t have that memory of why decisions were made, because many decisions were never made.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#159
post #92
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not apples for apples. Before: - Opus 4.6 each premium request is 3 premium requests After: - Opus 4.6 each dollar spent is 27 dollars in copilot AI Credits. Given that you'll receive 19 dollars of AI Credits in Business plan, that means you can probably say 1 "hi" to opus per month.

It is an apples for apples comparison since those new multipliers only count if you are on an annual plan in which case the premium request system stays in place until you either cancel and get a refund or until your renewal comes up. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/billing/usage-ba... If you are not on an annual plan, multipliers will be gone completely. You can see the rates that apply instead here: htt…

Thanks for that link. Oddly the blog post didn't contain any of this information.

Re: GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Link to the announcement for anyone else like me who hasn't gotten the email yet: https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/github-copilo... Not really sure why I would stick with Copilot after this, and increasing Sonnet from 1x to 9x for annual subscribers is highway fucking robbery. Very glad I didn't commit myself to an annual plan.

What does that mean? That copilot users can use 1/9th of their prior usage of Sonnet?

Not quite. Premium models have different type of multipliers applied. The multiplier decides how many PRUs (premium request units or tokens) are used. These PRUs are replaced with different units with this announcement but the methodology remains the same: https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/billing/copilot-...

Sometimes the multiplier increase is significant like for Claude Opus 4.6 from 3x to 27x (https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/reference/copilot-billing...), meaning using that model will use up a lot more „tokens“ (whatever the new word for it is)

Post reply on HN