How about not believing everything that's posted to the Internet. This could've easily been done with Photoshop in the pre AI era.
And they easily could have been arrested for making photoshops of the same event.
South Korea police arrest man for posting AI photo of runaway wolf
71–80 of 172 posts
Re: South Korea police arrest man for posting AI photo of runaway wolf
#72It sounds like he didn’t actually file a false police report. They don’t even say they asked him whether it’s true. It seems the police just read a post by a random person on the internet, assumed it’s true, then arrested him when it wasn’t. The article is devastatingly light on info, though, so I can’t be sure.
Yeah, we can't actually tell whether the image was posted with the poster going 'hey, @SouthKoreanPolice, wolf is here!', or whether it was xit out without any comment or context, or whether it was in response to a friend who lives in the vicinity of the location in the picture wondering where the wolf was,...
I don't care enough to bother finding out, but seems like the BBC could have done some more journalism, if they were so inclined.
Re: South Korea police arrest man for posting AI photo of runaway wolf
#73Re: South Korea police arrest man for posting AI photo of runaway wolf
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
Crying wolf is normally starting the operation while there isn‘t a wolf. This is misdirection while there is a wolf Similar but different
That's completely pedantic and besides it's false because there literally wasn't a wolf there where he faked the photo in the first place
Crying wolf is crying for help when there is no danger not when there is a danger just at different place.
That's not pedantic, that's the meaning of the idiom.
Re: South Korea police arrest man for posting AI photo of runaway wolf
#75Title should be "Man arrested for deceptive and antisocial behavior". The only reason you are seeing this right now is because it has AI in the title.
I so wish this were true. Put AI in the title, garner instant attention.
Re: South Korea police arrest man for posting AI photo of runaway wolf
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
Crying wolf is normally starting the operation while there isn‘t a wolf. This is misdirection while there is a wolf Similar but different
That's completely pedantic and besides it's false because there literally wasn't a wolf there where he faked the photo in the first place
what if the real criers of wolves were the sheeple we misled along the way?
Re: South Korea police arrest man for posting AI photo of runaway wolf
#77The BBC article doesn't specify the text with the image, but I clearly see a procedural gap in the police department. Accusing a man who only posted a photo, reorganizing the search based on an unverified photo, it's a big failure.
Did Orwell teach anything? What will they do with the next Visitors' spaceship photo?
Re: South Korea police arrest man for posting AI photo of runaway wolf
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fable was always relevant, afaic it is still a part of the curriculums. It's also a nice illustration of how LLMs screw up everything they touch - and please don't serve me the old "guns don't kill people - people kill people" argument over this.
> It's also a nice illustration of how LLMs screw up everything they touch And you'll be shocked what the kids have been doing with databases and API calls
???
Re: South Korea police arrest man for posting AI photo of runaway wolf
#79Title should be "Man arrested for deceptive and antisocial behavior". The only reason you are seeing this right now is because it has AI in the title.
That would be so vague as to be useless.
Re: South Korea police arrest man for posting AI photo of runaway wolf
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fable was always relevant, afaic it is still a part of the curriculums. It's also a nice illustration of how LLMs screw up everything they touch - and please don't serve me the old "guns don't kill people - people kill people" argument over this.
Is there a reason you felt the need to slip this non sequitur in your reply?
I am not sure, but it probably isn't because I wanted to sound smart by using smart sounding words :)