Live data from Hacker News

Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs

bloomberg.com

441–450 of 923 posts

Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs

#441

During mass layoffs, why haven't companies offered employees the opportunity to drop down to a four day work week? I'd think many would take the extra day off each week, even if it included a proportional reduction in pay.

Because it isn’t scientific. It is about appeasing irrational investors who demand a blood sacrifice. This is why it is always a big even number, and not some carefully established number based on analysis of operational shortcomings.

Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs

#442

During mass layoffs, why haven't companies offered employees the opportunity to drop down to a four day work week? I'd think many would take the extra day off each week, even if it included a proportional reduction in pay.

Because the stock market won't care about that.

Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs

#443

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everyone has clients and if your employees aren't incompetent sycophants they can give you actionable feedback.

Not a commentary on Zuck specifically, but many powerful people with fragile egos build an inner circle of incompetent sycophants

My favorite story from "Careless People," was when his team let him cheat and ultimately win at Settlers of Catan.

Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs

#444

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everyone has clients and if your employees aren't incompetent sycophants they can give you actionable feedback.

Not a commentary on Zuck specifically, but many powerful people with fragile egos build an inner circle of incompetent sycophants

My favorite story from "Careless People," was when his team let him cheat and ultimately win at Settlers of Catan.

Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs

#445

Let's be honest, Meta over hired. Big time. If anyone ever interviewed a few Meta engineers, he would easily see that a large percentage of them had really small, and sometimes bullshit scopes. As a result, such engineers couldn't articulate what they do in Meta, couldn't deep dive into their own tech stacks, nor could solve common-sense design questions when they just deviated a bit from those popular interview ques…

Presumably meta will always need engineers. Why fire staff who have meta experience and inevitably have to hire more engineers probably in some weeks or days? Engineers who will need onboarding and might not turn out too.

Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs

#446

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So let me ask this. What is the perfect mix of inerviews and durations? If you ask my blue collar friends, the answer is one and however long it takes to drink three beers. If you ask any married person, the onboarding process (courtship) may last YEARS and consist of many interviews (dates). As an EM, ive always struggled with this one. Im about to invest some serious coin and brainspace for you, so I tended towards…

What does a pilot or doctor or cop do in terms of interviews, take homes etc.?

Pilot at a major airline here: 1.5 hours of interviews with two people (recruiter and another pilot). Technical and HR-style questions, a personality test, no other homework.

Blood test, background check including all prior training records that are reported to the FAA.

Not a lot of work for the candidate in the interview, but it's easy to fail one too many training events or accumulate a violation and become radioactive.

Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs

#447

During mass layoffs, why haven't companies offered employees the opportunity to drop down to a four day work week? I'd think many would take the extra day off each week, even if it included a proportional reduction in pay.

You’d have to go company-wide to sync schedules and norms. Not just opt in. Many would not like a 20% pay cut. The best talent would disproportionately leave.

Also, theoretically Meta is getting rid of their worst performers, so their cuts and declines in productivity would not be proportional, especially as the cuts inspire fear to motivate productivity from the remaining employees.

Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs

#449

During mass layoffs, why haven't companies offered employees the opportunity to drop down to a four day work week? I'd think many would take the extra day off each week, even if it included a proportional reduction in pay.

A couple reasons I would guess:

1. Full carrying cost of an employee is much more then their salary so this math is not as straight forward if you’re just cutting time and salary to account for that time.

2. You should assume most people aren’t counting hours in places like Meta, reducing to a 4 day week imho will start making people think more about counting exact hours they’re working. It’s partially why the “4 10s” concept is also a bad idea that permeates the defense contractors.

3. Staying focused 5 days a week for one person probably has better compounding effects for that week than a few people working part time and taking longer to get the work done with longer breaks in between “sessions”. Harder to measure of course but it’s one thing I’d be worried about. Easier to think about if you say each person works 2.5 days a week for half their pay, I’d rather just have one person.

4. Layoffs let you cut by performance.

Post reply on HN