I find the scale of some companies hard to understand, they're laying off multiples of the total number of employees of the largest company I've worked at.
Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs
51–60 of 923 posts
Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs
#52Re: > If America’s so rich how’d it get so sad > https://www.derekthompson.org/p/if-americas-so-rich-howd-it-...
It's well known since ancient times that money doesn't buy happiness.
Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs
#53[flagged]
Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs
#54I have a genuine dislike for all Meta products now. With time, their intentions have become much more clear and it was never to bring people closer or whatever.
Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs
#55It's an honest surprise that this isn't spun as "internal AI efficiency gains." They want the efficiency, of course there's AI component, but they're not pre-claiming victory. Neat. It's worth remembering that there's an _actual_ underlying economic problem here. Interest rates are up. AI spending is expensive. A dollar invested in a company needs to do _more_ than it did 5 years ago, relative to sitting in treasury…
this seems a little hyperbolic without knowing details. they probably already cut around 5% every year for performance anyway (their performance reviews probably just came out). i could pretty easily see the rest of the reduction being unprofitable businesses like VR that they don't want to invest in anymore, it might not be due to AI at all
They also burn capital at insane rates on projects nobody wants then fire everybody involved (see: the metaverse, the very reason they rebranded to that dumb name)
Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Are weekends off un-american too because it came from worker movements? Re: replies that one day off has been around much longer. Yes that’s what changed - the change was for 2 days off.
Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs
#57Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs
#58It's an honest surprise that this isn't spun as "internal AI efficiency gains." They want the efficiency, of course there's AI component, but they're not pre-claiming victory. Neat. It's worth remembering that there's an _actual_ underlying economic problem here. Interest rates are up. AI spending is expensive. A dollar invested in a company needs to do _more_ than it did 5 years ago, relative to sitting in treasury…
Meta is working on "personal AI that will empower you". Saying they are firing people because of AI would be a bad marketing move.
Re: Meta tells staff it will cut 10% of jobs
#59It's an honest surprise that this isn't spun as "internal AI efficiency gains." They want the efficiency, of course there's AI component, but they're not pre-claiming victory. Neat. It's worth remembering that there's an _actual_ underlying economic problem here. Interest rates are up. AI spending is expensive. A dollar invested in a company needs to do _more_ than it did 5 years ago, relative to sitting in treasury…
There is nothing "cowardly" about it.
Would you rather them never hire them in the first place?