As much as the website looks nice, the design looks AI generated - image loading animations, or quotation marks for species names. (Both are needles decorations.)
Isopods of the world
21–30 of 70 posts
Re: Isopods of the world
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
As someone who has done some stacked photos, they always look suspicious! If it's any consolation, I recognize the photographer and they are the sort of person who would never use AI!
What does "stacked" mean in this context?
So a workaround is to take a lot of photos with the focus plane at different depths. You sweep the focus plane through the scene, snapping a lot of photos as you go. This can be automatic with nice gear.
Then you take all of those photos and combined them digitally, with the algorithm selecting pixels from the photo with the best sharpness in that region. So the photo you see is a combination of many photos.
Re: Isopods of the world
#23As much as the website looks nice, the design looks AI generated - image loading animations, or quotation marks for species names. (Both are needles decorations.)
Re: Isopods of the world
#24Plenty of worries if those images are AI-generated. I'll give the author the benefit of the doubt as he's a macro photographer: https://www.nickybay.com/
> Plenty of worries if those images are AI-generated. What would be so worrying about someone using AI to generate images for their site?
AI generated images are not appropriate for source or reference material.
Re: Isopods of the world
#25Re: Isopods of the world
#26Re: Isopods of the world
#27As much as the website looks nice, the design looks AI generated - image loading animations, or quotation marks for species names. (Both are needles decorations.)
Aren’t all decorations needless?
Re: Isopods of the world
#28Re: Isopods of the world
#29From the comments, there are apparently supposed to be amazing photos. But I see text, I see black backgrounds, but no photos--none at all. Neither on Firefox, nor on Chrome. Just empty boxes where say "Amber Ducky" should be.