(Originally from this Wavii Engineering blog post http://blog.wavii.com/2011/12/29/your-mileage-may-vary/ )
Let’s Talk Your Data, Not Big Data
11–20 of 23 posts
Re: Let’s Talk Your Data, Not Big Data
#12The wild confusion around "big data" stems in part from the fact that many people use it to mean something unrelated to data size. I was recently in a back-and-forth on twitter about this. Some people argued that "big data" refers to the complexity of the analysis or the value of the insight, rather than the size of the data. Kaggle CEO Anthony Goldbloom advocated for a definition "too big to fit in an excel spreadsh…
The presumption is that big companies have a lot of data, but not necessarily. They may just have unique data needs.
Re: Let’s Talk Your Data, Not Big Data
#13Re: Let’s Talk Your Data, Not Big Data
#14I just read this Wired article and now I'm wondering whether or not I just read an advertisement for Chartio?
P.S. If I could down vote twice, I'd give it a second one for turning a sentence into an article.
Re: Let’s Talk Your Data, Not Big Data
#15 - (Me) So, how much data are we talking about?
- (them) 50GB
- Per hour?
- No thats our dataset so far.
- (pause)
- (pause)
(FIN)Re: Let’s Talk Your Data, Not Big Data
#16The wild confusion around "big data" stems in part from the fact that many people use it to mean something unrelated to data size. I was recently in a back-and-forth on twitter about this. Some people argued that "big data" refers to the complexity of the analysis or the value of the insight, rather than the size of the data. Kaggle CEO Anthony Goldbloom advocated for a definition "too big to fit in an excel spreadsh…
I argue for your definition: "Big data is when the size of the data becomes part of the problem." Mike Loukides (O'Reilly) mentioned to me that Roger Magoulas (O'Reilly) was the first he heard using that definition. According to this definition, physicists in the 80's were doing big data.
O'Reilly's just pimpin' the term "Big Data" to sell books. They did the same with "Web 2.0", Java and the initial internet boom.
Re: Let’s Talk Your Data, Not Big Data
#17Note (as the example in the Wired article indicates) that the converse isn't true: just because you are using multiple machines to process data doesn't mean it's big.
Re: Let’s Talk Your Data, Not Big Data
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
I argue for your definition: "Big data is when the size of the data becomes part of the problem." Mike Loukides (O'Reilly) mentioned to me that Roger Magoulas (O'Reilly) was the first he heard using that definition. According to this definition, physicists in the 80's were doing big data.
People in science and commerce know data issues and have been dealing with the practice, analysis and theory for years. O'Reilly's just pimpin' the term "Big Data" to sell books. They did the same with "Web 2.0", Java and the initial internet boom.
Re: Let’s Talk Your Data, Not Big Data
#19the our company have different kinds, there have males, females also girls needing, products are suit for different groups of people, maybe there is something you are just waiting for.
To some people love jewelrys, sure this is the good news for you, our company because our company Remy Hair Extensions is a manufactures, so our company can be lace front wigs sure you are the only one to be focus on the world, the most False Eyelashes important, these are the jewelrys and fashion and design.
our company also have the Do you feeling amazing, then go and action, our company will take best services waiting for Fashion Jewelrys you !
Important!!: our company accept safe payment, like Paypal.... do fast shipping , sure we protect our clients privacy, make order to our company, you get the safe business and privacy !!!!!