California Regulator Issues Citations And Fines Against Uber, Lyft, And SideCar
1–10 of 17 posts
Re: California Regulator Issues Citations And Fines Against Uber, Lyft, And SideCar
#2Re: California Regulator Issues Citations And Fines Against Uber, Lyft, And SideCar
#3Re: California Regulator Issues Citations And Fines Against Uber, Lyft, And SideCar
#4Uber, on the other hand, looks completely legitimate to me. They partner with licensed and insured companies and provide an awesome experience.
Re: California Regulator Issues Citations And Fines Against Uber, Lyft, And SideCar
#5I'm not surprised they're going after Lyft and SideCar. These services scare me. Drivers are usually friendly, but far from the professionals I get with Uber. Some of these services don't even provide proper insurance. It will be interesting to see what happens when one of these drivers gets in an accident. Uber, on the other hand, looks completely legitimate to me. They partner with licensed and insured companies an…
Both are one lawsuit away from oblivion.
Re: California Regulator Issues Citations And Fines Against Uber, Lyft, And SideCar
#6I'm not surprised they're going after Lyft and SideCar. These services scare me. Drivers are usually friendly, but far from the professionals I get with Uber. Some of these services don't even provide proper insurance. It will be interesting to see what happens when one of these drivers gets in an accident. Uber, on the other hand, looks completely legitimate to me. They partner with licensed and insured companies an…
Lyft also has 1MM liability on each driver so nothing about them feels sketchy. [1]
My only complaint is they don't have enough drivers and so I can't always get a lift.
Re: California Regulator Issues Citations And Fines Against Uber, Lyft, And SideCar
#7I used sidecar a couple of times in SF and the experience was pretty mixed. It definitely feels sketchy when someone swings by in a Corolla, and it does very much feel like "ride sharing" in the truest sense of the word, with the unmistakable feel of a taxi also. Bizarre.
I much prefer Uber, but the pricing speaks for itself.
I'm not going to complain about the specifics of the enforcement action - no matter which way you slice it SideCar and Lyft most certainly were diving through loopholes. They are meant as a taxi service, no matter how hard they avert their eyes and insist the opposite.
But, and this is a huge but. The taxi experience in San Francisco is horrific - easily the worst out of any city I've ever lived in, and by a wide margin to boot. MUNI is also a perennial joke of a transit system. In a city as dense as San Francisco, dear government, with no functioning taxicab service and no functioning public transit system, how do you expect people to get around?
Uber, Lyft, and SideCar are born from the supremely fucked-upery of SF's transportation situation. Liability, driver training, and all of that are all legitimate questions, but IMO are separate from the question of whether or not these services should exist in the first place.
Re: California Regulator Issues Citations And Fines Against Uber, Lyft, And SideCar
#8So I am glad that these services are under a somewhat watchful eye.
Re: California Regulator Issues Citations And Fines Against Uber, Lyft, And SideCar
#9Re: California Regulator Issues Citations And Fines Against Uber, Lyft, And SideCar
#10I read somewhere recently that 80% of all stranger rapes against women are perpetrated by unlicensed taxi drivers. So I am glad that these services are under a somewhat watchful eye.