ChatGPT Images 2.0

Post by BoorishBears » Wed, Apr 22, 2026, 2:42 AM UTC

Melatonic wrote: post #65

dktp wrote: post #63

One interesting thing I found comparing OpenAI and Gemini image editing is - Gemini rejects anything involving a well known person. Anything. OpenAI is happy to edit and change every time I tried I have a sideproject where I want to display standup comedies. I thought I could edit standup comedy posters with some AI to fit my design. Gemini straight up refuses to change any image of any standup comedy poster involvin…

How does it determine they are well known and not just similar looking?

Post by mvkel » Wed, Apr 22, 2026, 2:43 AM UTC

Post by hyperadvanced » Wed, Apr 22, 2026, 2:46 AM UTC

dvt wrote: post #419

minimaxir wrote: post #234

So during my Nano Banana Pro experiments I wrote a very fun prompt that tests the ability for these image generation models to follow heuristics, but still requires domain knowledge and/or use of the search tool: Create a 8x8 contiguous grid of the Pokémon whose National Pokédex numbers correspond to the first 64 prime numbers. Include a black border between the subimages. You MUST obey ALL the FOLLOWING rules for th…

This is an amazing test and it's kinda' funny how terrible gpt-2-image is. I'd take "plagiarized" images (e.g. Google search & copy-paste) any day over how awful the OpenAI result is. Doesn't even seem like they have a sanity checker/post-processing "did I follow the instructions correctly?" step, because the digit-style constraint violation should be easily caught. It's also expensive as shit to just get an image th…

Post by CamperBob2 » Wed, Apr 22, 2026, 2:46 AM UTC

vunderba wrote: post #83

OpenAI’s gpt-image-1.5 and Google’s NB2 have been pretty much neck and neck on my comparison site which focuses heavily on prompt adherence, with both hovering around a 70% success rate on the prompts for generative and editing capabilities. With the caveat being that Gemini has always had the edge in terms of visual fidelity. That being said, gpt-image-1.5 was a big leap in visual quality for OpenAI and eliminated m…

Post by vunderba » Wed, Apr 22, 2026, 2:50 AM UTC

CamperBob2 wrote: post #467

vunderba wrote: post #83

OpenAI’s gpt-image-1.5 and Google’s NB2 have been pretty much neck and neck on my comparison site which focuses heavily on prompt adherence, with both hovering around a 70% success rate on the prompts for generative and editing capabilities. With the caveat being that Gemini has always had the edge in terms of visual fidelity. That being said, gpt-image-1.5 was a big leap in visual quality for OpenAI and eliminated m…

It'd be interesting if you could add HunyuanImage-3 to the competition. It's better than Z-Image at almost everything I've thrown at it. It can be (slowly) run at home, but needs 96GB RTX 6000-level hardware so it is not very popular.