Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX says it has agreement to acquire Cursor for $60B

twitter.com

151–160 of 1001 posts

Re: SpaceX says it has agreement to acquire Cursor for $60B

#151

I’m no fan of Elon Musk, but even from a neutral perspective I’m bewildered by the merger between X, X.ai, and SpaceX and now this acquisition of Cursor. What’s the endgame? How does this help with the whole vision of “we all live in space and mine resources from the Moon and have data centers on Mars”?

idk but feels like this might be a new literal kind of acquihire, to bulk purchase workers in cash

Re: SpaceX says it has agreement to acquire Cursor for $60B

#152
post #94

knee-jerk is that it's weird, but makes sense: * X will have a total of ~2GW of GPU sometime this year largely not doing much outside of 'grok is this true' * despite no longer being in vogue with consumer devs Cursor still has a lot of developer data that can assist in building a model * Cursor have decent enterprise relationships (while for xAI it is ~zero) and that's where the real revenue for llms + agents is * C…

You forgot to consider whether all this is worth $60B.

> forgot to consider whether all this is worth $60B

I see two possibilities:

(1) SpaceX is paying with stock; and

(2) the $60bn pay-out is (a) conditional or (b) never going to be exercised—it was a stalking horse for negotiating the $10bn terms, which gives SpaceX everything it actually wants.

Re: SpaceX says it has agreement to acquire Cursor for $60B

#153
I guess the hope is that combining two sub-par coding models (xAI's grok + cursor's composer) and combining the data they have access to, they can build something that can compete with OpenAI / Anthropic in the coding space...

I guess I kinda see it... it makes sense from both points of view (xAI needs data + places to run their models, cursor needs to not be reliant on Anthropic/OpenAI).

I think I don't see it working out... I just don't see an Elon company sustaining a culture that leads to a high-quality AI lab, even with the data + compute.

Re: SpaceX says it has agreement to acquire Cursor for $60B

#156

Lots of people in the comments talking about how this is about training data, but surely this is actually about hiring competent people after the mass exodus/firing at xAI?

Are cursor developers “competent” in creating frontier models? Aren’t they just using other company’s models?

Re: SpaceX says it has agreement to acquire Cursor for $60B

#158

That's a hefty payday for a model that barely functions! Every time I run out of API credits and get kicked back to Composer 2 I feel like I'm better off just packing up for the rest of the month. I feel like we're finally at a point where you don't have to constantly argue with and constantly babysit coding models, which makes it even more frustrating when you're suddenly forced to deal with one that ignores your in…

Cursor is still the best coding environment and hardness. It's actually not really close. They are so good that they actually made Gemini usable. The problem is they can't compete with Anthropic and OpenAI because they can't sell Opus and GPT at a discount to subscribers like OpenAI and Anthropic do with their subscriptions. So they either need to build a competing model or slowly die.

They seemed to be doing fine with Kimi distillation. Not speaking from experience though, I prefer to use my editor.

Re: SpaceX says it has agreement to acquire Cursor for $60B

#159
post #130

Wow, we are seeing the dark underbelly of the beast here. Nobody talks about cursor anymore for a reason. Look, I'm not saying it's not useful and discounting anyone getting value out of it... But it's clearly not worth 60B dollars in April 2026.

A crazy and lucky bailout for Cursor + investors.
Post reply on HN