By the way, Skype's registration page has inexplicable password rules. aaaaa1 - strength: medium aaaaa12345 - strength: poor =aStu!et$aQ@212345 - strength: poor
Yeah, at my last job, someone implemented a password strength checking feature that would actually reject stronger passwords. It required: 1. At least 3 out of the 4 categories uppercase, lowercase, digit, special character 2. No character could be repeated more than two times 3. No sequence of 3 or more increasing or decreasing letters or numbers could be present (and not even consecutive: "ta/Tbs#cz" would be rejec…
Skype vulnerability allowing hijacking of an account if you know just the email
111–120 of 124 posts
Re: Skype vulnerability allowing hijacking of an account if you know just the email
#112In August I received an email from Skype thanking me for registering an account. But I already had an account, I didn't register this one. After comparing the new account name with part of my email, I came to the conclusion that someone mistyped their email address, and registered an account on my address. I contacted their live support, here's the conversation: George A: Hello! Welcome to Skype Live Support! My name…
Re: Skype vulnerability allowing hijacking of an account if you know just the email
#113I'm genuinely curious- what's keeping people on Skype? There are better alternatives out there now (Google+ Hangouts, for example). Will this push any of you Skype users over?
Re: Skype vulnerability allowing hijacking of an account if you know just the email
#114In August I received an email from Skype thanking me for registering an account. But I already had an account, I didn't register this one. After comparing the new account name with part of my email, I came to the conclusion that someone mistyped their email address, and registered an account on my address. I contacted their live support, here's the conversation: George A: Hello! Welcome to Skype Live Support! My name…
Turing test failure, or highly trained human? I'm not sure.
Re: Skype vulnerability allowing hijacking of an account if you know just the email
#115By the way, Skype's registration page has inexplicable password rules. aaaaa1 - strength: medium aaaaa12345 - strength: poor =aStu!et$aQ@212345 - strength: poor
Yeah, at my last job, someone implemented a password strength checking feature that would actually reject stronger passwords. It required: 1. At least 3 out of the 4 categories uppercase, lowercase, digit, special character 2. No character could be repeated more than two times 3. No sequence of 3 or more increasing or decreasing letters or numbers could be present (and not even consecutive: "ta/Tbs#cz" would be rejec…
Re: Skype vulnerability allowing hijacking of an account if you know just the email
#116I'm genuinely curious- what's keeping people on Skype? There are better alternatives out there now (Google+ Hangouts, for example). Will this push any of you Skype users over?
Re: Skype vulnerability allowing hijacking of an account if you know just the email
#117In August I received an email from Skype thanking me for registering an account. But I already had an account, I didn't register this one. After comparing the new account name with part of my email, I came to the conclusion that someone mistyped their email address, and registered an account on my address. I contacted their live support, here's the conversation: George A: Hello! Welcome to Skype Live Support! My name…
What's interesting is after spending 30min or so clicking around Blizzard's site there is no way to actually contact support without having an account. You also can't claim the account, because you need a first and last name along with the email address, and I only have one of their names.
In the end I just left it, it was an old account and there is no evidence that they had real access, and as it was a legacy account I'd securified it anyway (creating a massive 32character random password and storing it in a password manager, just to close off any loose ends).
Re: Skype vulnerability allowing hijacking of an account if you know just the email
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
Longer than two minutes, definitely! More than 2 hours to investigate and fix? very doubtful. 3 months? That's a bit much...
I see your not familiar with the nature of code deployments and everything that has to happen beforehand. ;) The two hours were most likely spent on office politics as opposed to fixing the problem. I'm surprised it wasn't > 5 hours to be honest.
Re: Skype vulnerability allowing hijacking of an account if you know just the email
#119Re: Skype vulnerability allowing hijacking of an account if you know just the email
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
I see your not familiar with the nature of code deployments and everything that has to happen beforehand. ;) The two hours were most likely spent on office politics as opposed to fixing the problem. I'm surprised it wasn't > 5 hours to be honest.
Given your description I'm sure I'm lucky I'm not familiar with that. I've never worked at any place that has > 40 employees. If I can manage, I hope never to have to.