AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing
1–10 of 439 posts
Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing
#2Doesn't mean it's correct, or empirically-based.
Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing
#3Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing
#4Would the scrapers not just add these sites to do not crawl list?
Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing
#5Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing
#6I find it kind of sad that people are spending time and energy on this. It seems like something depressed people would do. But free country and all that
Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing
#7So is vaccine resistance. Doesn't mean it's correct, or empirically-based.
We've had literal generations of experience with vaccines, tons of data with formal systems to collect it, and most of the "resistance" traces back to "I dun wanna" and hearsay.
In contrast, LLM prompt-injection is an empirically proven issue, along with other problems like wrongful correlations (both conventional ones like racism and inexplicable ones), self-bias among models, and humans generally deploying them in very irresponsible ways.
Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing
#8Maybe I have slop to thank for it.
Re: AI Resistance: some recent anti-AI stuff that’s worth discussing
#9Meanwhile: the ability to poison models, if it can be made to work reliably, is a genuinely interesting CS question. I'm the last person in the world to build community with anti-AI activists, but I'm as interested as anybody in attacks on them! They should keep that up, and I think you'll see threads about plausible and interesting attacks are well read, including by people who don't line up with the underlying cause.