Live data from Hacker News

Dole/Kemp '96 Online Campaign

dolekemp96.org

41–50 of 98 posts

Re: Dole/Kemp '96 Online Campaign

#41

Makes you wonder who, if anyone, is still paying to host the site. Someone must be keeping it online on purpose, right?

Domain whois shows it's registered to "4President Corporation" and it shares a host with http://4president.org/ with provider 'hostmysite'.

Looks like this is someone's intentional effort to archive these things.

Re: Dole/Kemp '96 Online Campaign

#42
post #10

Ahh, 1996 was an awesome year for websites. Space Jam: http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/

I've always wondered, what's the best looking website of the 1990s? Was there anything that people would deem as "good" as some of today's top designs?

I feel like there had to be at least someone with a very refined sense of aesthetic making awesome websites back then.

Re: Dole/Kemp '96 Online Campaign

#43

I wish sites were still designed this way. Not the animated gifs or the font size 1, but the fact that once the site is loaded, it's completely done. And if I refresh the page, or bookmark the link and come back later, I'm going to see the exact same page. According to the Chrome developer tools the page took 2ms to render and 4ms to paint. I write JavaScript professionally but not all web sites need JavaScript, in f…

I my main monitor in portrait mode. The ReadWrite site is absolutely horrible this way.

Re: Dole/Kemp '96 Online Campaign

#45
post #10

Ahh, 1996 was an awesome year for websites. Space Jam: http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/

I've always wondered, what's the best looking website of the 1990s? Was there anything that people would deem as "good" as some of today's top designs? I feel like there had to be at least someone with a very refined sense of aesthetic making awesome websites back then.

At the time the web was only a couple of years old and it was yet to even hit the "lets get serious" radar of just about everyone.

Essentially, no. There was no one with a very refined aesthetic making websites at the time. Even the Louvre's website (one of the first art museum websites I remember popping up) was extremely ugly.

Re: Dole/Kemp '96 Online Campaign

#46
post #30

I was going to ask: " so how is it that the average non-commercial site can be expected to crash upon reaching ten HN upvotes but this 1996 is still chugging along strong " After all, this was well before such thing as CDNs were in wide use. Then I looked at the source and saw that it's a Frontpage site. * This brings back memories of when you could get at least $50/hr to make something like this.

The average non-commercial site these days is based on an unoptimized Wordpress installation that loads 137 PHP files and does 18 DB reqests to render its main page. This 1996 gem is entirely static content. That's a few orders of magnitude less work for the server to do right there. And it runs on IIS 7, so the the hardware and software that does the actual work is most definitely NOT from 1996.

Re: Dole/Kemp '96 Online Campaign

#47

I wish sites were still designed this way. Not the animated gifs or the font size 1, but the fact that once the site is loaded, it's completely done. And if I refresh the page, or bookmark the link and come back later, I'm going to see the exact same page. According to the Chrome developer tools the page took 2ms to render and 4ms to paint. I write JavaScript professionally but not all web sites need JavaScript, in f…

I'm with you for the most part but I find that #fff background with #000 text is pretty harsh on my eyes. I think there is a sweet spot somewhere in the middle.

The biggest problem with readability for me lately is awful Google Fonts which never render right.

Re: Dole/Kemp '96 Online Campaign

#48
post #2

There is a link at the bottom of the page to: http://www.4president.org/ This site has archives of campaign websites, website features, and campaign ads. I think it's fascinating to see the paradigm shifts in web design indicated by these four-year gaps. And campaigns being a temporary thing, I think they perfectly encapsulate the design of the "era". I was going through the years and was thinking "sure, a lot change…

I think the biggest aesthetic change was between 04 and 08 which makes sense sine that was the era that so-called "Web 2.0" took off.

Re: Dole/Kemp '96 Online Campaign

#49
post #10

Ahh, 1996 was an awesome year for websites. Space Jam: http://www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/

I've always wondered, what's the best looking website of the 1990s? Was there anything that people would deem as "good" as some of today's top designs? I feel like there had to be at least someone with a very refined sense of aesthetic making awesome websites back then.

Drudge Report. Even if you don't like the political "lean" of it (I, personally, don't), you have to appreciate a design that has (basically) stayed the same since it was founded in the mid 90s. The "minimalism" from Drudge had a big impact on a lot of modern web design.

Re: Dole/Kemp '96 Online Campaign

#50

I wish sites were still designed this way. Not the animated gifs or the font size 1, but the fact that once the site is loaded, it's completely done. And if I refresh the page, or bookmark the link and come back later, I'm going to see the exact same page. According to the Chrome developer tools the page took 2ms to render and 4ms to paint. I write JavaScript professionally but not all web sites need JavaScript, in f…

Various publications tout low intensity, medium/low-contrast as a tool to reduce eyestrain. IMHO, default font size, line spacing and column width are more important than high contrast (somewhat of a problem on this site too)

Thought: should we aim to vary contrast by device?

On my mobile phone I prefer sites with higher contrast, especially when out and about, on my retina iPad however, sites with white backgrounds and lots of text are much more tiring/difficult to process (plus bright screens, incl. tablets and phones are shown to result in insomnia [1]).

At the risk of going completely O/T here, f.lux [2] has helped me a lot in this respect.

[1] http://gizmodo.com/5524005/experts-kindle-helps-you-sleep-ip...

[2] http://stereopsis.com/flux/

Post reply on HN