Live data from Hacker News

Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily are AI-generated

techcrunch.com

101–110 of 405 posts

Re: Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily are AI-generated

#101

This shit is so dark. I mean, popular music has always been pretty formulaic, and prone to imitation and trite bullshit, but at least when humans were making it, you'd occasionally get some spark of genius, real originality, even in the most mundane forms. I use LLMs for code every day, but if I could flip a switch to turn it all off and prevent this shit from happening to the arts, I probably would.

Butlerian Jihad vibes are building.

Re: Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily are AI-generated

#102

I'm trying to learn music production with a DAW, sometimes I wonder if I'm wasting my time. Part of my reason for trying this was reading how creative endeavors can be therapeutic (I'm dealing with burnout/depression/cptsd). I'm at the stage where sometimes I make something that sounds good (to me) but I know it requires work (in the "not fun" sense) to finish it and even then, it will likely never be appreciated by…

You're not wasting your time, my friend. But you've got to be very certain and honest as to why you want to learn that. If your goal is being heard and appreciated, well, you better reconsider. If you're doing it for your own pleasure and pure love of art, absolutely do go on, without any expectations. It may or may not take off, but the samurai must not care.

I 100% agree with this and have found it to entirely be my own drive for learning and creating.

For me it is beyond trying to make money or become famous, it is simply to enjoy the journey and the creativity that comes with creating music.

Re: Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily are AI-generated

#103
This is incentivized by how streaming compensates artists. If these folks can also bot a bunch of "listens" to this slop they get paid out of everyone's monthly subscription payment. I want a streaming service where my money only goes to the artists I listen to - not to Taylor Swift and Suno artist #3141592.

Re: Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily are AI-generated

#105
From the press release, it's not all that clear what Deezer is doing about it. 44% of uploads getting less than 1% of non-fraudulent streams seems like a pretty strong reason to outright ban AI generated submissions.

For the non-fraudulent listens, I'm very curious how many of these are part of auto-generated playlists. Are people just being served this music as part of a feed, or are they actually seeking it out? I'd be very surprised if it was the latter.

Re: Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily are AI-generated

#106
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It depends what you want to get out of it, and what you think art itself really is. If it's nothing but an end product, that needs to fit a specific aesthetic, with a specific sound, then I probably agree. AI is making that "pointless" in a way. Almost everyone I know who's been an artist for years though, has come to a similar realization: What you set out to create, and what it turns into through the process of cre…

Thanks, I like this answer. I think part of my problem is more general, a struggle to enjoy something when I can tell I'm not good at it. It's kind of a circular problem, I will need to spend more time on it to get better and I need to conjure confidence that I could do so out of the ether. I have experienced the process you're talking about, although to some degree I feel it's symptomatic of a lack of skill. I start…

I’ve also struggled with the “not enjoying something because I suck at it” problem, and it’s a tough one. The answer is to remove expectations, but much easier said than done.

That said, I wonder if doing it with other people who suck would help. I started playing ice hockey as an adult, and the thing that got me over the initial hump of being completely useless was doing lessons with other newbies in my exact shoes (or skates) rather than trying to go right to full speed games.

Re: Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily are AI-generated

#108

What a coincidence. Just today, someone on my high school alumni group just posted an album they "made", which is 100% AI generated music. They claim authorship because they created the prompts to the AI. My feeling is that if the AI is this good, the audience will just prompt the AI themselves and cut out the middleman.

> My feeling is that if the AI is this good, the audience will just prompt the AI themselves and cut out the middleman.

I call this the instant imitator trap. If anything AI generates stands out from the slop, the slop generators will just imitate it, thus quickly making whatever standout quality from the "original" work also slop.

I wrote about it here: https://tombedor.dev/creativity/

Re: Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily are AI-generated

#109

I'm trying to learn music production with a DAW, sometimes I wonder if I'm wasting my time. Part of my reason for trying this was reading how creative endeavors can be therapeutic (I'm dealing with burnout/depression/cptsd). I'm at the stage where sometimes I make something that sounds good (to me) but I know it requires work (in the "not fun" sense) to finish it and even then, it will likely never be appreciated by…

You're not wasting your time, my friend. But you've got to be very certain and honest as to why you want to learn that. If your goal is being heard and appreciated, well, you better reconsider. If you're doing it for your own pleasure and pure love of art, absolutely do go on, without any expectations. It may or may not take off, but the samurai must not care.

> the samurai must not care

Definitely recommend to OP to explore the modern warrior philosophy drawing from bushido.

Re: Deezer says 44% of songs uploaded to its platform daily are AI-generated

#110
post #80

I'm trying to learn music production with a DAW, sometimes I wonder if I'm wasting my time. Part of my reason for trying this was reading how creative endeavors can be therapeutic (I'm dealing with burnout/depression/cptsd). I'm at the stage where sometimes I make something that sounds good (to me) but I know it requires work (in the "not fun" sense) to finish it and even then, it will likely never be appreciated by…

It depends what you want to get out of it, and what you think art itself really is. If it's nothing but an end product, that needs to fit a specific aesthetic, with a specific sound, then I probably agree. AI is making that "pointless" in a way. Almost everyone I know who's been an artist for years though, has come to a similar realization: What you set out to create, and what it turns into through the process of cre…

> Stripping all of that out, and jumping to a "finished" product, is, well very product focused, but to me completely devoid of art or musicianship.

This hits very close to the philosophical core of the AI debacle.

All hardcore fans of AI just want things done. The process is of no interest to them.

This is truly an eschatologic problem of desire. Consider:

Some people want to grab their result, attain satiation, have orgasm, and die, right now.

Others would much rather enjoy the process, the meal itself, indulge in gentle act of love in tune with the partner, and just keep on living their lives, continuously.

Post reply on HN