We accepted surveillance as default
vivianvoss.net
We accepted surveillance as default
1–10 of 159 posts
Re: We accepted surveillance as default
#2Re: We accepted surveillance as default
#3Whenever I read your articles, I get distracted by the space invaders and just play that instead. Maybe this is a problem with me being a bit ADHD, but I feel like I am not the only one
Re: We accepted surveillance as default
#4What is really needed is a hard fork of major browsers by a grass roots community to advance HTML standards to include partial template rendering solutions without the reliance on Javascript.
Of course this is a startup forum so the response is just going to be wittled down to observations about economic value. However if users start to change/fight then the economics will too.
Re: We accepted surveillance as default
#5Re: We accepted surveillance as default
#6The irony of using AI to generate an article on this topic...
Re: We accepted surveillance as default
#7Whenever I read your articles, I get distracted by the space invaders and just play that instead. Maybe this is a problem with me being a bit ADHD, but I feel like I am not the only one
Re: We accepted surveillance as default
#8The irony of using AI to generate an article on this topic...
Re: We accepted surveillance as default
#9WHATWG wants to co-mingle document rendering with javascript (this is the real reason they are removing XSLT and not proposing a replacement, it skirts this enforcement) so that when you try to disable javascript or block tracking it breaks the document rendering, leaving the only option to leave Javascript enabled and ad blockers off. Other protocols gemini, gopher etc don’t have the same issues because they’re alre…
Re: We accepted surveillance as default
#10What a contrast to modern websites which require all sorts of weird clicking gymnastics to disable similar tracking.