31–40 of 378 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're misunderstanding. The government is the one that said it didn't want/couldn't use this "weapon."
> The government is the one that said it didn't want/couldn't use this Technically, the Pentagon did. I don’t know if that’s legally binding on the NSA.
NSA never cared about rules.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Haven't you heard? Under the new form of government in the US, random tweets from the President ARE government policy, superseding laws and any act of Congress. The Supreme Court has blessed this new form of government, declaring that the President is immune to all laws, but retaining for themselves the right to reverse any tweet on the "shadow docket".
It’s funny that you say that tweets are US policy when the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s tariffs.
The pace at which we sprint toward a full blown surveillance state, with unaccountable oracles sentencing us for pre-crime, is alarming to say the least.
You realize Mythos can read this, right? I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords.
This is not surprising. Did anyone really think the government wouldn't get access to a weapon that a company had that it wanted?
You're misunderstanding. The government is the one that said it didn't want/couldn't use this "weapon."
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Haven't you heard? Under the new form of government in the US, random tweets from the President ARE government policy, superseding laws and any act of Congress. The Supreme Court has blessed this new form of government, declaring that the President is immune to all laws, but retaining for themselves the right to reverse any tweet on the "shadow docket".
It’s funny that you say that tweets are US policy when the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s tariffs.
The pace at which we sprint toward a full blown surveillance state, with unaccountable oracles sentencing us for pre-crime, is alarming to say the least.