Earlier quoted context omitted.
10 years ago it was Heroku and Three.js.
10 years ago it was Heroku and Ruby on Rails*
Vercel April 2026 security incident
301–310 of 540 posts
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#302Earlier quoted context omitted.
Security is hard and there are only three vendors I trust: AWS, Google and IBM ( yes IBM ). Anything else is just asking for trouble.
Oracle too
The Oracle that published an announcement that said "we didn't get hacked" when the hackers had private customer info?
The Oracle that does not allow you to do any security testing on their software unless you use one of their approved vendors?
The Oracle that one of my customers uses where they have to turn off the HR portal for 2 weeks before annual performance evaluations because there is no way to prevent people from seeing things?
The only reason Oracle isn't having nightmarish security problems published every other week is because they threaten to sue anyone that does find an issue.
Oracle is a joke in every conceivable way and I despise them on a personal level.
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#303What is the rationale for using vercel ? I'm getting a lot of value out of cloudflare with the $5/month plan lately but my bare metal box with triple digit ram has seen zero downtime since 2015.
They put a massive amount of VC cash into convincing people that Next.js was "the modern way" to create a website. Then they got lucky with the timing of LLMs becoming popular while they were the hot thing, leading LLMs to default to it when creating new websites. To picture that amount of VC cash - they're at Series F , and a huge chunk of that went towards marketing. Both have been changing as people realize it's r…
This is why most open source landing pages used nextjs, and if most FOSS landing pages use it, then most LLM’s have been trained on it, which means LLM’s are more familiar with that framework and choose it
There must be a term for this kind of LLM driven adoption flywheel…
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#304They just added more details: > Indicators of compromise (IOCs) > Our investigation has revealed that the incident originated from a third-party AI tool whose Google Workspace OAuth app was the subject of a broader compromise, potentially affecting hundreds of its users across many organizations. > We are publishing the following IOC to support the wider community in the investigation and vetting of potential malicio…
https://x.com/rauchg/status/2045995362499076169 > A Vercel employee got compromised via the breach of an AI platform customer called http://Context.ai that he was using. > Through a series of maneuvers that escalated from our colleague’s compromised Vercel Google Workspace account, the attacker got further access to Vercel environments. > We do have a capability however to designate environment variables as “non-sens…
On the one hand, I get that it's a Sunday, and the CEO can't just write a mass email without approval from legal or other comms teams.
But on the other hand... It's Sunday. Unless you're tuned-in to social media over the weekend, your main provider could be undergoing a meltdown while you are completely unaware. Many higher-up folks check company email over the weekend, but if they're traveling or relaxing, social media might be the furthest thing from their mind. It really bites that this is the only way to get critical information.
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#305> Vercel did not specify which of its systems were compromised I’m no security engineer, but this is flatly unacceptable, right? This feels like Vercel is covering its own ass in favor of helping its customers understand the impact of this incident.
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#306Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#307Claude Code defaulting to a certain set of recommended providers[0] and frameworks is making the web more homogenous and that lack of diversity is increasing the blast radius of incidents [0] https://amplifying.ai/research/claude-code-picks/report
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#308Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t understand why they can’t just directly name the responsible app as it will come out eventually.
Maybe legal red tape?
Better to report 100% known things quickly. People can figure it out with near zero effort, and it reduces one tiny bit of potential liability in the ops shitstorm they’re going through.
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#309Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's why I wrote my own compiler and coreutils. Can't trust some shit written by GNU developers 30 years ago. And my own kernel. Can't trust some shit written by a Finnish dude 30 years ago. And my own UEFI firmware. Definitely can't trust some shit written by my hardware vendor ever.
Yeah definitely no difference between GNU coreutils and some vibe coded AI tool released last month that wants full oAuth permissions.
Re: Vercel April 2026 security incident
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
The thing I can’t stop thinking about is that Ai is accelerating convergence to the mean (I may be misusing that) The internet does that but it feels different with this
> convergence to the mean That's a funny way of saying "race to the bottom." > The internet does that but it feels different with this How does "the internet do that?" What force on the internet naturally brings about mediocrity? Or have we confused rapacious and monopolistic corporations with the internet at large?
Stack exchange. Google.