Earlier quoted context omitted.
Negative effects were immediately noticed. The change in smog was apparent. Road laws rapidly advanced. Road building standards rapidly changed. Congestion was also very much apparent, and the reason behind massive highway building effort that came some thirty years after the car's rise to popularity. Really these people decades ago had a great grasp on these things. But why did they "fail" and we still have traffic?…
They failed because traffic can’t be fixed by adding capacity. The inefficiency of cars will mean you can never build enough roads to keep ahead of consumption. Traffic gets fixed by getting most people to use some other form of transport and leaving cars to the edge case uses.
The future of everything is lies, I guess: Where do we go from here?
521–530 of 830 posts
Re: The future of everything is lies, I guess: Where do we go from here?
#522Earlier quoted context omitted.
It would be difficult, but not necessarily THAT difficult. With enough pushback from the public, AI would start getting regulated in meaningful ways. The problem is too many people love it, and see no problem with it. Because the momentum and money is on their side, it feels like it is impossible. Maybe things will turn out fine and we will just live in a similar but more depressing future, but if the pro-AI crowd ge…
> Maybe things will turn out fine and we will just live in a similar but more depressing future Or things could turn out more than fine and we progress as we've always progressed, towards more abundance and humans in 30 years will live massively better lives than we live today, just as we live massively better lives than people at just about any previous point in history.
This is blatantly unsustainable.
> just about any previous point in history
The late 1990s is an exception for most people.
It sounds like things are going well for you. Be mindful of psychological projection.
Re: The future of everything is lies, I guess: Where do we go from here?
#523Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Just because a technology can be useful doesn't mean it will have positive effects on society. You say it in a way that it sounds like automobiles don't have a positive effect. I don't agree - they have some negative effects but overall they have a vast net positive effect for everyone.
What benefit do cars provide that public transit doesn't? How are thousands of individual cars better than light rail? Cars aren't a positive in society. Transportation is the benefit, and cars are the worst possible way to transport people. A functioning public transit system is better in every possible way apart from egotistical arguments like "I don't like seeing poor people on the bus".
Re: The future of everything is lies, I guess: Where do we go from here?
#524Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you forgot discipline and long-term thinking in your core values. Even before high technology, there were things to plan and resources to manage. Especially after the beginning of agriculture.
Long term thinking is out when you can't predict more than a few months ahead at most.
Re: The future of everything is lies, I guess: Where do we go from here?
#525Earlier quoted context omitted.
No. I'm doing it because I care more whether I can live with myself than whether I impress people with the name of who I work for. Hence much of my recent comment history here, for example. I don't want any of these people getting the idea they should want me to work with them, either. I do want my name on every industry blacklist I can possibly get it on. Those will eventually be revealed - remember Franklin's dictu…
That's nice for you but other people have kids to feed and don't particularly care about your little crusade, which will fail.
Re: The future of everything is lies, I guess: Where do we go from here?
#526Earlier quoted context omitted.
They failed because traffic can’t be fixed by adding capacity. The inefficiency of cars will mean you can never build enough roads to keep ahead of consumption. Traffic gets fixed by getting most people to use some other form of transport and leaving cars to the edge case uses.
Sure traffic can be fixed by adding capacity. Demand is ultimately finite. You see this in places like the midwest where there is overcapacity on the highway system and you can go a mile a minute across the region pretty much at all hours of the day.
Re: The future of everything is lies, I guess: Where do we go from here?
#527"I could retrain, but my core skills—reading, thinking, and writing—are squarely in the blast radius of large language models." Yes. For the lifetime of almost everyone alive now, reading, thinking, and writing have been valued skills which moved one up in society's hierarchy. This is a historical anomaly. Prior to 1800 or so, those skills were not all that useful to the average farmer. There were more smart people t…
I'm seeing a lot of comments like this lately: "Oh well, we were in an anomalous time of social growth, time to go backwards! We won't even need to read or write or think! It's all just too bad, but that's just the way the world works, like it did in 1800." [or pick your date before any current person was alive] Lots of people have started considering a time of significant "progress" as "an anomaly", as if the world…
I think, in a way, the Internet itself is the virus. It has infiltrated us and our minds. Rage and suffering are what get clicks and engagement. The Internet has become a suffering engine, which spins angst into gold.
Re: The future of everything is lies, I guess: Where do we go from here?
#528This is a must-read series of articles, and I think Kyle is very much correct. The comparison to the adoption of automobiles is apt, and something I've thought about before as well. Just because a technology can be useful doesn't mean it will have positive effects on society. That said, I'm more open to using LLMs in constrained scenarios, in cases where they're an appropriate tool for the job and the downsides can b…
> Now might be a good time to call your representatives.
Well, not that must-read I guess
Re: The future of everything is lies, I guess: Where do we go from here?
#529Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rental cars are expensive because they are covering the risk and increased wear and tear of rental drivers. As well as the downtime of when the car is rented to you but you aren’t driving it. Self driving cars would make this massively cheaper and remove most of the reasons to own a car. It would make about as much sense as owning a train for most people.
Yep just like how massively cheaper housing is to rent, right?
If I bought and sold a house every time I needed somewhere to stay on holiday, renting would be massively cheaper.
I’ve already done the math and uber occasionally is cheaper than owning a car. Self driving electric will be even cheaper.
Re: The future of everything is lies, I guess: Where do we go from here?
#530Question: The author makes this article available on the web as a series of posts, a PDF ( https://aphyr.com/data/posts/411/the-future-of-everything-is... ) and an EPUB. What do you suppose their tooling looks like? Is there a single "document containing all the words," and it updates the website, pdf, and epub whenever you change it? What struck me was that the presentation is beautiful. It seems worth emulating. Bu…
For my blog, I write posts in Markdown. Then the build process uses Pandoc to convert the posts into web pages and, for certain pages, PDF files typeset with TeX. For example, here is a post in both web and PDF versions:
(Web) https://blog.moertel.com/posts/2024-08-23-sampling-with-sql....
(Typeset PDF) https://blog.moertel.com/images/public_html/blog/pix-2024060...