Live data from Hacker News

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

qwen.ai

271–280 of 563 posts

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#271
post #270

I've been running this on my laptop with the Unsloth 20.9GB GGUF in LM Studio: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-GGUF/blob/mai... It drew a better pelican riding a bicycle than Opus 4.7 did! https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/16/qwen-beats-opus/

I've had some really gnarly SVGs from Claude. Here's what I got after many iterations trying to draw a hand: https://imgur.com/a/X4Jqius

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is just one model in the Qwen 3.6 series. They will most likely release the other small sizes (not much sense in keeping them proprietary) and perhaps their 122A10B size also, but the flagship 397A17B size seems to have been excluded.

How many people/hackernews can run a 397b param model at home? Probably like 20-30.

I can (barely, but sustainably) run Q3.5 397B on my Mac Studio with 256GB unified. It cost $10,000 but that's well within reach for most people who are here, I expect.

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We re-uploaded Gemma4 4 times - 3 times were due to 20 llama.cpp bug fixes, which we helped solve some as well. The 4th is an official Gemma chat template improvement from Google themselves, so these are out of our hands. All providers had to re-fix their uploads, so not just us. For MiniMax 2.7 - there were NaNs, but it wasn't just ours - all quant providers had it - we identified 38% of bartowski's had NaNs. Ours w…

I just wanted to express gratitude to you guys, you do great work. However, it is a little annoying to have to redownload big models though and keeping up with the AI news and community sentiment is a full time job. I wish there was some mechanism somewhere (on your site or Huggingface or something) for displaying feedback or confidence in a model being "ready for general use" before kicking off 100+ GB model downloa…

Best policy is to just wait a couple of weeks after a major model is released. It's frustrating to have to re-download tens or hundreds of GB every few days, but the quant producers have no choice but to release early and often if they want to maintain their reputation.

Ideally the labs releasing the open models would work with Unsloth and the llama.cpp maintainers in advance to work out the bugs up front. That does sometimes happen, but not always.

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How many people/hackernews can run a 397b param model at home? Probably like 20-30.

I can (barely, but sustainably) run Q3.5 397B on my Mac Studio with 256GB unified. It cost $10,000 but that's well within reach for most people who are here, I expect.

$10k is well outside my budget for frivolous computer purchases.

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#276
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So I can use this in claude code with `ollama run claude`?

More like `ollama launch claude --model qwen3.6:latest` Also you need to check your context size, Ollama default to 4K if <24 Gb of VRAM and you need 64K minimum if you want claude to be able to at least lift a finger.

If you're on a Mac, use the MLX backend versions which are considerably faster than the GGML based versions (including llama.cpp) and you don't need to fiddle with the context size. The models are `qwen3.6:35b-a3b-nvfp4`, `qwen3.6:35b-a3b-mxfp8`, and `qwen3.6:35b-a3b-mlx-bf16`.

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#277
post #255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How many people/hackernews can run a 397b param model at home? Probably like 20-30.

OpenRouter.

Yeah I think there’s benefits to third-party providers being able to run the large models and have stronger guarantees about ZDR and knowing where they are hosted! So Open Weights for even the large models we can’t personally serve on our laptops is still useful.

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#278
post #270

I've been running this on my laptop with the Unsloth 20.9GB GGUF in LM Studio: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-GGUF/blob/mai... It drew a better pelican riding a bicycle than Opus 4.7 did! https://simonwillison.net/2026/Apr/16/qwen-beats-opus/

How does it do with the "car wash" benchmark? :D

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#279

Already quantized/converted into a sane format by Unsloth: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-GGUF

Why doesn't Qwen itself release the quantized model? My impression is that quantization is a highly nontrivial process that can degrade the model in non-obvious ways, thus its best handled by people who actually built the model, otherwise the results might be disappointing.

Users of the quantized model might be even made to think that the model sucks because the quantized version does.

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How many people/hackernews can run a 397b param model at home? Probably like 20-30.

I can (barely, but sustainably) run Q3.5 397B on my Mac Studio with 256GB unified. It cost $10,000 but that's well within reach for most people who are here, I expect.

I'm running it on my Intel Xeon W5 with 256GB of DDR5 and Nvidia 72GB VRAM. Paid $7-8k for this system. Probably cost twice as much now.

Using UD-IQ4_NL quants.

Getting 13 t/s. Using it with thinking disabled.

Post reply on HN