Live data from Hacker News

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

qwen.ai

181–190 of 563 posts

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#181
post #10

How does this compare to the commercial models like Sonnet 4.5 or GPT? Close enough that the price is right (free)?

The will not measure up. Notice they're comparing it to Gemma, Google's open weight model, not to Gemini, Sonnet, or GPT. That's fine - this is a tiny model. If you want something closer to the frontier models, Qwen3.6-Plus (not open) is doing quite well[1] (I've not tested it extensively personally): https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6

on the bright side also worth to keep in mind those tiny models are better than GPT 4.0, 4.1 GPT4o that we used to enjoy less than 2 years ago [1]

[1] https://artificialanalysis.ai/?models=gpt-5-4%2Cgpt-oss-120b...

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fair enough, appreciate the detailed response! Can you elaborate why other quantizations weren't affected (e.g. bartowski)? Simply because they were straight Q4 etc. for every layer?

No Bartowski's are more affected - (38% NaN) than ours (22%) - for MiniMax 2.7 see https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1slk4di/minimax... We already fixed ours. Bart hasn't yet but is still working on it following our findings. blk.61.ffn_down_exps in Q4_K or Q5_K failed - it must be in Q6_K otherwise it overflows. For the others, yes layers in some precision don't work. For eg Qwen3.5 ssm_out must be minimu…

Thanks again, TIL

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#183

This is surprisingly close to Haiku quality, but open - and Haiku is quite a capable model (many of the Claude Code subagents use it).

Where did you see a haiku comparison? Haiku 4.5 was my daily driver for a month or so before Opus 4.5 dropped and would be unreasonably happy if a local model can give me similar capability

Artificial Analysis hasn't posted their independent analysis of Qwen3.6 35B A3B yet, but Alibaba's benchmarks paint it as being on par with Qwen3.5 27B (or better in some cases).

Even Qwen3.5 35B A3B benchmarks roughly on par with Haiku 4.5, so Qwen3.6 should be a noticeable step up.

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models?models=gpt-oss-120b%2Cg...

No, these benchmarks are not perfect, but short of trying it yourself, this is the best we've got.

Compared to the frontier coding models like Opus 4.7 and GPT 5.4, Qwen3.6 35B A3B is not going to feel smart at all, but for something that can run quickly at home... it is impressive how far this stuff has come.

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#184

Already quantized/converted into a sane format by Unsloth: https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-GGUF

How much VRAM does it need? I haven't run a local model yet, but I did recently pick up a 16GB GPU, before they were discontinued.

Pick a decent quant (4-6KM) then use llama-fit-params and try it yourself to see if it's giving you what you need.

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#185
post #9

Nice release from the Qwen team. Small openweight coding models are, imho, the way to go for custom agents tailored to the specific needs of dev shops that are restricted from accessing public models. I'm thinking about banking and healthcare sector development agencies, for example. It's a shame this remains a market largely overlooked by Western players, Mistral being the only one moving in that direction.

I play with the small open weight models and I disagree. They are fun, but they are not in the same class as hosted models running on big hardware.

If some organization forbade external models they should invest in the hardware to run bigger open models. The small models are a waste of time for serious work when there are more capable models available.

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#188

This is surprisingly close to Haiku quality, but open - and Haiku is quite a capable model (many of the Claude Code subagents use it).

Where did you see a haiku comparison? Haiku 4.5 was my daily driver for a month or so before Opus 4.5 dropped and would be unreasonably happy if a local model can give me similar capability

I didn't see a direct comparison, but there's some overlap in the published benchmarks:

                           │ Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B │ Haiku 4.5               
   ────────────────────────┼──────────────────┼──────────────────────── 
    SWE-Bench Verified     │ 73.4             │ 66.6                    
   ────────────────────────┼──────────────────┼──────────────────────── 
    SWE-Bench Multilingual │ 67.2             │ 64.7                    
   ────────────────────────┼──────────────────┼──────────────────────── 
    SWE-Bench Pro          │ 49.5             │ 39.45                   
   ────────────────────────┼──────────────────┼──────────────────────── 
    Terminal Bench 2.0     │ 51.5             │ 61.2 (Warp), 27.5 (CC)  
   ────────────────────────┼──────────────────┼──────────────────────── 
    LiveCodeBench          │ 80.4             │ 41.92                   

These are of course all public benchmarks though - I'd expect there to be some memorization/overfitting happening. The proprietary models usually have a bit of an advantage in real-world tasks in my experience.

Re: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic coding power, now open to all

#189
Related interesting find on Qwen.

"Qwen's base models live in a very exam-heavy basin - distinct from other base models like llama/gemma. Shown below are the embeddings from randomly sampled rollouts from ambiguous initial words like "The" and "A":"

https://xcancel.com/N8Programs/status/2044408755790508113

Post reply on HN