Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude Opus 4.7

anthropic.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

101–110 of 1001 posts

Re: Claude Opus 4.7

#101

Post by GaryBluto »

endymion-light wrote: post #16

I'm not sure how much I trust Anthropic recently. This coming right after a noticeable downgrade just makes me think Opus 4.7 is going to be the same Opus i was experiencing a few months ago rather than actual performance boost. Anthropic need to build back some trust and communicate throtelling/reasoning caps more clearly.

> This coming right after a noticeable downgrade just makes me think Opus 4.7 is going to be the same Opus i was experiencing a few months ago rather than actual performance boost.

If they are indeed doing this, I wonder how long they can keep it up?

Re: Claude Opus 4.7

#102

Post by mesmertech »

klipitkas wrote: post #67
mesmertech wrote: post #48

Not showing up in claude code by default on the latest version. Apparently this is how to set it: /model claude-opus-4-7 Coming from anthropic's support page, so hopefully they did't hallucinate the docs, cause the model name on claude code says: /model claude-opus-4-7 ⎿ Set model to Opus 4 what model are you? I'm Claude Opus 4 (model ID: claude-opus-4-7).

It does not work, it says Claude Opus 4 not 4.7

I think its just a visual/default thing, cause Opus 4.0 isn't offered on claude code anymore. And opus 4.7 is on their official docs as a model you can change to, on claude code

Just ask it what model it is(even in new chat).

what model are you?

I'm Claude Opus 4 (model ID: claude-opus-4-7).

https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11940350-claude-code-...

Re: Claude Opus 4.7

#103

Post by [deleted] »

cupofjoakim wrote: post #20

> Opus 4.7 uses an updated tokenizer that improves how the model processes text. The tradeoff is that the same input can map to more tokens—roughly 1.0–1.35× depending on the content type. caveman[0] is becoming more relevant by the day. I already enjoy reading its output more than vanilla so suits me well. [0] https://github.com/JuliusBrussee/caveman/tree/main

[deleted]

Re: Claude Opus 4.7

#104

Post by ACCount37 »

grandinquistor wrote: post #94

Quite a big improvement in coding benchmarks, doesn’t seem like progress is plateauing as some people predicted.

People were "predicting" the plateau since GPT-1. By now, it would take extraordinary evidence for me to take such "predictions" seriously.

Re: Claude Opus 4.7

#105

Post by mesmertech »

vesrah wrote: post #82
mesmertech wrote: post #48

Not showing up in claude code by default on the latest version. Apparently this is how to set it: /model claude-opus-4-7 Coming from anthropic's support page, so hopefully they did't hallucinate the docs, cause the model name on claude code says: /model claude-opus-4-7 ⎿ Set model to Opus 4 what model are you? I'm Claude Opus 4 (model ID: claude-opus-4-7).

On the most current version (v2.1.110) of claude: > /model claude-opus-4.7 ⎿ Model 'claude-opus-4.7' not found

I'm on the max $200 plan, so maybe its that?

Re: Claude Opus 4.7

#106

Post by hgoel »

not_ai wrote: post #15
benleejamin wrote: post #6

For anyone who was wondering about Mythos release plans: > What we learn from the real-world deployment of these safeguards will help us work towards our eventual goal of a broad release of Mythos-class models.

Oh look it was too powerful to release, now it’s just a matter of safeguards. This story sounds a lot like GPT2.

This seems needlessly cynical. I don't think they said they never planned to release it.

They seemed to make it clear that they expect other labs to reach that level sooner or later, and they're just holding it off until they've helped patch enough vulnerabilities.

Re: Claude Opus 4.7

#107

Post by alecco »

msp26 wrote: post #85
benleejamin wrote: post #6

For anyone who was wondering about Mythos release plans: > What we learn from the real-world deployment of these safeguards will help us work towards our eventual goal of a broad release of Mythos-class models.

They don't have the compute to make Mythos generally available: that's all there is to it. The exclusivity is also nice from a marketing pov.

They don't have demand for the price it would require for inference.

They are definitely distilling it into a much smaller model and ~98% as good, like everybody does.

Re: Claude Opus 4.7

#108

Post by r0fl »

buildbot wrote: post #12

Too late, personally after how bad 4.6 was the past week I was pushed to codex, which seems to mostly work at the same level from day to day. Just last night I was trying to get 4.6 to lookup how to do some simple tensor parallel work, and the agent used 0 web fetches and just hallucinated 17K very wrong tokens. Then the main agent decided to pretend to implement tp, and just copied the entire model to each node...

Same! I thought people were exaggerating how bad Claude has gotten until it deleted several files by accident yesterday

Codex isn’t as pretty in output but gets the job done much more consistently

Re: Claude Opus 4.7

#109

Post by perdomon »

It seems like we're hitting a solid plateau of LLM performance with only slight changes each generation. The jumps between versions are getting smaller. When will the AI bubble pop?
Post reply on HN