Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT for Excel

chatgpt.com

41–50 of 209 posts

Re: ChatGPT for Excel

#41
post #11

Copying Anthropic again lol. Damn that OAI valuation is like a sore boil that is about to explode. Also once again, a lack of imagination from OAI. Damn vision really is super scarce huh.

saltman look so desperate.

meanwhile not that ant is genius, except the timing of dow drama right before Iran war.

Re: ChatGPT for Excel

#44
post #16

As someone that knows a high-flying portfolio manager who works at a very well known firm that I wont name... I can confidently state these tools are DOA. Ive spoken to them at length about the nature of what these people actually do day-to-day. If you think its just about using excel then you're already way off. They (OAI+Anthropic) very much do not get exactly what these people are doing in the job (accounting+corp…

I know the firm - it's RenTech.

nah the firm in question has much higher AUM.

Re: ChatGPT for Excel

#45
post #42

Copilot is so bad that chatGPT is offered to replace it. [for] ... users outside the EU. hmm

Your comment is recognized as low effort, but Copilot has been OAI models behind the scenes. For enterprise customers, quickly being replaced by Sonnet as a default.

Re: ChatGPT for Excel

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a significant difference in experience between Copilot Basic for a M365 user whose IT admins have blocked integration capabilities with Sharepoint content vs Copilot Premium for a M365 user whose IT admins have allowed integration capabilities with Sharepoint content.

Microsoft is better off not allowing copilot basic because of the reputational harm it will do. Not that they are thinking through copilot rationally

[deleted]

Re: ChatGPT for Excel

#47
post #39

In principle, I find it valuable to integrate tools. However, in this case I would be somewhat cautious, especially as "your chats, attachments, and workbook content — may be shared with OpenAI" (as per the Microsoft Marketplace description: https://marketplace.microsoft.com/en-us/product/WA200010215?... ). This seems like a security nightmare, which is especially relevant because sensitive data is often stored in Ex…

[deleted]

Re: ChatGPT for Excel

#48
post #39

In principle, I find it valuable to integrate tools. However, in this case I would be somewhat cautious, especially as "your chats, attachments, and workbook content — may be shared with OpenAI" (as per the Microsoft Marketplace description: https://marketplace.microsoft.com/en-us/product/WA200010215?... ). This seems like a security nightmare, which is especially relevant because sensitive data is often stored in Ex…

That's the nature of these add-ins. Modern Add-ins are all little XML frames with some JS or whatever. All processing occurs server-side, hosted by the add-in publisher.

This is counter to the old (security nightmare) COM model where processing could be local.

Re: ChatGPT for Excel

#49

This looks bad for Microsoft. They added a Copilot button to all their products but it doesn't do much more than open a chat side panel. I recently tried Claude Cowork for PowerPoint and I was stunned by the content as well as design quality of the deck it produced. That's a threat for Microsoft because now you don't need the editing tools of PowerPoint, AI replaces it, so all you need is the presentation mode of Pow…

Claude for excel is already amazing. Fully capable of doing junior work. Formatting is great. Can refactor large multi-tab spreadsheets. It just burns tokens. If OpenAI is going to subsidize this on the monthly enterprise plans for a while then it's a game changer.

Claude for Excel (I work in finance) was one of the absolutely critical reasons we added Anthropic enterprise licenses. But they've turned out to be quite expensive ($100/day for heavy users). We'll see what OpenAI's quotas are.

Re: ChatGPT for Excel

#50
post #48
post #39

In principle, I find it valuable to integrate tools. However, in this case I would be somewhat cautious, especially as "your chats, attachments, and workbook content — may be shared with OpenAI" (as per the Microsoft Marketplace description: https://marketplace.microsoft.com/en-us/product/WA200010215?... ). This seems like a security nightmare, which is especially relevant because sensitive data is often stored in Ex…

That's the nature of these add-ins. Modern Add-ins are all little XML frames with some JS or whatever. All processing occurs server-side, hosted by the add-in publisher. This is counter to the old (security nightmare) COM model where processing could be local.

To clarify: add-ins are essentially web pages. They can do some processing client side if they want, but yeah in the case of a ChatGPT add-in it's not like they're running the model in a web frame.
Post reply on HN