Earlier quoted context omitted.
> LLM output doesn't have the variety of human output, since they operate in fixed fashion - statistical inference followed by formulaic sampling. This is the wrong thing to look at; your chess analogy is much stronger, the detection method similar (if you can figure out a prompt that generates something close to the content, it almost certainly isn't human origin). But to why the thing I'm quoting doesn't work: If y…
What if the prompt includes, "Produce output that doesn't sound like an AI generated it."?
Google Gemma 4 Runs Natively on iPhone with Full Offline AI Inference
161–170 of 196 posts
Re: Google Gemma 4 Runs Natively on iPhone with Full Offline AI Inference
#162Unfortunately Apple appears to be blocking the use of these llms within apps on their app store. I've been trying to ship an app that contains local llms and have hit a brick wall with issue 2.5.2
I think Apple will become increasingly draconian about LLMs. Very soon people won't need to buy many of their apps. They can just make them. This threatens Apple's entire business model.
https://9to5mac.com/2026/03/01/apple-replacing-core-ml-with-...
Re: Google Gemma 4 Runs Natively on iPhone with Full Offline AI Inference
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s tempting to be flippant about MacOS/windows but in all seriousness, the resources required for an LLM to do the job of a typical lighter weight app/software is a serious consideration. No amount of bloat matches what an LLM needs.
> No amount of bloat matches what an LLM needs. I don't think that's necessarily true. For instance, LinkedIn uses more memory than Gemma E2B inference does.
Re: Google Gemma 4 Runs Natively on iPhone with Full Offline AI Inference
#164Re: Google Gemma 4 Runs Natively on iPhone with Full Offline AI Inference
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
What spec of Framework Desktop do you run this on?
If you're looking to buy new hardware, also consider the Asus Rog Flow Z13. It has the same chip as the Framework desktop and is ~20% cheaper ($2,700) for the 128 GB spec while coming in a tablet/laptop form factor. It's capped at a slightly lower power but Strix Halo scales down very well in TDP - I never even use the max power mode on my Z13 because you don't really get any extra perf. The only downside is that I s…
I put my boards in mini itx rack mounts personally so framework is the only option.
Re: Google Gemma 4 Runs Natively on iPhone with Full Offline AI Inference
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's very impressive but it's streaming in weights from flash storage. That's not really viable in a mobile context, it will use way too much power. Smaller models are way more applicable to typical use, perhaps with mid-sized models (like the Gemma4 26A4B model) using weights offload from SSD for rare uses involving slower "pro" inference.
10 minutes a day of extreme power usage is probably fine for people asking for directions to the store, setting calendar reminders, timers, checking for important emails etc. AI on your phone will be incredibly useful but power usage doesn't matter when total usage is less than 15 minutes per day. I don't think the average person expects to vibe code on the phone for 8 hours a day.
Re: Google Gemma 4 Runs Natively on iPhone with Full Offline AI Inference
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't care if it's written by an LLM. The problem with the article is the complete lack of details. No benchmarks on the iPhone capable models. No details, whatsoever. Human or LLM - the article is a whole lot of nothing.
Funnily enough, to me these aphorisms (?) sound almost like the replicant test in Blaze Runner. Like these are the unit bit of "nudging"
"It's not just X – it's Y." Slop. "You're absolutely right!" Slop. "And this is key –" Slop. "This is a nuanced topic." Slop.
Re: Google Gemma 4 Runs Natively on iPhone with Full Offline AI Inference
#168I noticed the inference is routed through the gpu rather than the Apple neural engine. Google’s engineers likely gave up on trying to compile custom attention kernels for Apple’s proprietary tensor blocks iirc. While Metal is predictable and easy to port to, it drains the battery way faster than a dedicated NPU. Until they rewrite the backend for the ANE, this is just a flashy tech demo rather than a production-ready…
Are the Apple neural engines even a practical target of LLMs? Maybe not strictly impossible, but ANE was designed with an earlier, pre-LLM style of ML. Running LLMs on ANE (e.g. via Core ML) possible in theory, but the substantial model conversion and custom hardware tuning required makes for a high hurdle IRL. The LLM ecosystem standardized around CPU/GPU execution, and to date at least seems unwilling to devote res…