Kalshi CEO expects US DOJ to prosecute insider trading cases
1–10 of 150 posts
Re: Kalshi CEO expects US DOJ to prosecute insider trading cases
#2Re: Kalshi CEO expects US DOJ to prosecute insider trading cases
#3So like, which is it, is insider trading expected, or are these just gambling sites that should be illegal in many jurisdictions?
Re: Kalshi CEO expects US DOJ to prosecute insider trading cases
#4Ok, but isn't the idea that prediction markets surface private knowledge a big part of the defense as to why they shouldn't be treated as illegal gambling? So like, which is it, is insider trading expected, or are these just gambling sites that should be illegal in many jurisdictions?
Re: Kalshi CEO expects US DOJ to prosecute insider trading cases
#5Ok, but isn't the idea that prediction markets surface private knowledge a big part of the defense as to why they shouldn't be treated as illegal gambling? So like, which is it, is insider trading expected, or are these just gambling sites that should be illegal in many jurisdictions?
No. Their defense is that they are a gamified platform for futures contracts and hence should fall under CFTC regulation.
The CFTC also cracks down on insider trading, but it took time for them to write regulations to catch up with prediction markets.
It is now a priority [0] and they have just started a paid whistleblower [1] programs specifically to catch insider traders within prediction markets.
[0] - https://www.lw.com/en/insights/new-cftc-enforcement-director...
[1] - https://www.whistleblower.gov/whistleblower-alerts/Insider_T...
Re: Kalshi CEO expects US DOJ to prosecute insider trading cases
#6Ok, but isn't the idea that prediction markets surface private knowledge a big part of the defense as to why they shouldn't be treated as illegal gambling? So like, which is it, is insider trading expected, or are these just gambling sites that should be illegal in many jurisdictions?
Re: Kalshi CEO expects US DOJ to prosecute insider trading cases
#7“If you commit insider trading on Kalshi, that can and will at some point be a federal crime. It is a federal crime, I actually do expect the DOJ to prosecute some of these cases”. I'm guessing that “some point” is sometime after Jan 20th 2029.
Re: Kalshi CEO expects US DOJ to prosecute insider trading cases
#8At most some low-level flunkie will get named and slapped on the wrist.
Re: Kalshi CEO expects US DOJ to prosecute insider trading cases
#9Ok, but isn't the idea that prediction markets surface private knowledge a big part of the defense as to why they shouldn't be treated as illegal gambling? So like, which is it, is insider trading expected, or are these just gambling sites that should be illegal in many jurisdictions?
> isn't the idea that prediction markets surface private knowledge a big part of the defense as to why they shouldn't be treated as illegal gambling No. Their defense is that they are a gamified platform for futures contracts and hence should fall under CFTC regulation. The CFTC also cracks down on insider trading, but it took time for them to write regulations to catch up with prediction markets. It is now a priorit…
I find prediction markets to be interesting on two fronts:
1) They like a really good way to determine the probability of something happening, which is interesting for events like elections
2) It provides an avenue for smart bettors to take advantage and sharpen their skill, whereas they get severely limited or banned from traditional sports books
However, it seems like all incentive structures for the markets and consumer behavior will steer these things to degenerate gambling.
Re: Kalshi CEO expects US DOJ to prosecute insider trading cases
#10Ok, but isn't the idea that prediction markets surface private knowledge a big part of the defense as to why they shouldn't be treated as illegal gambling? So like, which is it, is insider trading expected, or are these just gambling sites that should be illegal in many jurisdictions?
Prediction markets don’t need to surface private knowledge, they can surface sophisticated interpretations of public knowledge. They are certainly gambling if you’re an unsophisticated rube (which is most of the users).