Fixing a 20-year-old bug in Enlightenment E16
1–10 of 193 posts
Re: Fixing a 20-year-old bug in Enlightenment E16
#2I wonder how many other teenagers got catfished into becoming software devs and sysadmins by the siren song of rasterman.
Re: Fixing a 20-year-old bug in Enlightenment E16
#3Re: Fixing a 20-year-old bug in Enlightenment E16
#4E16 was the hook that caught me and landed me, flopping and writhing, on the decks of Linux - I saw a black and white printout of someone’s desktop, and immediately set about figuring out how to get this unbelievable coolness working on my laptop. By the time I was done I was muttering modelines in my sleep, and had already committed my first patches to a kernel module. I wonder how many other teenagers got catfished…
Re: Fixing a 20-year-old bug in Enlightenment E16
#5E16 was the hook that caught me and landed me, flopping and writhing, on the decks of Linux - I saw a black and white printout of someone’s desktop, and immediately set about figuring out how to get this unbelievable coolness working on my laptop. By the time I was done I was muttering modelines in my sleep, and had already committed my first patches to a kernel module. I wonder how many other teenagers got catfished…
Me too! Looking at my old windows 98 machine and then at slackware Linux with enlightenment lured me to Linux and began a lifelong journey!
Re: Fixing a 20-year-old bug in Enlightenment E16
#6Certainly wasn't considered lightweight back then :-)
I never saw the appeal of Enlightenment, but a very nice write-up regardless.
Re: Fixing a 20-year-old bug in Enlightenment E16
#7I loved using the environment but would regularly harangue him for being glib on resource usage. It really was otherwise very ahead of the curve.
Re: Fixing a 20-year-old bug in Enlightenment E16
#8There was some kind of editing snafu though, the loop header in the big (first) code block reads:
for (i = 0; i
But the references to it in the text, and updated versions in the patches, show it as just for (;;)
That was confusing me a bit.Re: Fixing a 20-year-old bug in Enlightenment E16
#9My last time I used it was still in the 1990's, before I settled into Afterstep and soon afterwards Windowmaker.
In what concerns my use of GNU/Linux, it was CDE on others.
Apparently nothing big came out of Enlightenment and Tizen.
Re: Fixing a 20-year-old bug in Enlightenment E16
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Me too! Looking at my old windows 98 machine and then at slackware Linux with enlightenment lured me to Linux and began a lifelong journey!
Same for me. Slackware (I guess 4.0) and E16 was my first proper Linux installation. Learned so much during that time.