31–40 of 129 posts
I really hope this doesn't have the same security model as Chrome Extensions! I can see the appeal of this feature and I am generally speaking an AI booster. On the other hand...like...wat? This feature feels way too premature and risky to let loose on the public.
my most commonly repeated prompt; would be nice if the baked it into the tool itself: "No emojis. be concise. no suggestions unless I explicitly ask for them. answer questions like the machine you are. Don't try and add personality or humour; remember you're a robot."
my most commonly repeated prompt; would be nice if the baked it into the tool itself: "No emojis. be concise. no suggestions unless I explicitly ask for them. answer questions like the machine you are. Don't try and add personality or humour; remember you're a robot."
my most commonly repeated prompt; would be nice if the baked it into the tool itself: "No emojis. be concise. no suggestions unless I explicitly ask for them. answer questions like the machine you are. Don't try and add personality or humour; remember you're a robot."
> Don't try and add personality or humour; remember you're a robot." > remember you're a robot." The anthropomorphization juxtaposed to the actual command is a bit ironic.
My prompt collection lives in three different places right now — Raycast snippets, Apple Notes, and a Notion page that keeps growing. I know I wrote a good one for my git commit/push flow somewhere, but finding it when I need it usually takes longer than just rewriting it. The browser approach makes sense for Claude code and ChatGPT. I wonder how well it holds up once you have 50+ prompts though — finding the right o…
This is cleaner, though :)
Who wants this?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Don't try and add personality or humour; remember you're a robot." > remember you're a robot." The anthropomorphization juxtaposed to the actual command is a bit ironic.
It really does make you wonder why all the models seem to require that. In principle, it shouldn't be a property of LLMs, and lol no it's not an "emergent property".
I really hope this doesn't have the same security model as Chrome Extensions! I can see the appeal of this feature and I am generally speaking an AI booster. On the other hand...like...wat? This feature feels way too premature and risky to let loose on the public.
There are no third-party Skills, you can only create your own or use Google's readymade ones.
Furthermore, it led me to muse whether "Prompt Gemini for " was a thing that any URL could do? If I went to a random malicious website, could they prompt Gemini to do something for me? If Gemini was hooked up to my Gmail, could a malicious prompt delete all my email, and all it would take is a misclick? Chilling.