DaVinci Resolve – Photo
blackmagicdesign.com
DaVinci Resolve – Photo
1–10 of 307 posts
Re: DaVinci Resolve – Photo
#2Pretty cool. Would be great if you could use it on its own app instead of having to load a Resolve project.
Re: DaVinci Resolve – Photo
#3Nice. And this should be fully supported on Linux too, I hope.
Re: DaVinci Resolve – Photo
#4DaVinci Resolve has been an incredible value. Hoping this becomes a viable contender vs Capture One and Lightroom.
Re: DaVinci Resolve – Photo
#5Davinci resolve studio is awesome.
I've been editing my videos by transcription for the past two years. Can edit very quickly. Takes about 2 hours to edit a one hour video. It's actually faster than working with an editor.
Re: DaVinci Resolve – Photo
#6This honestly made my day. I’ve been looking for a way to manage my photos on Linux for a while. Lightroom has been the only reason I’ve stuck with a Mac.
If I can switch to a photo editor that lets me process everything properly, skip the monthly subscription, and not have Adobe tracking all over my system—that’s exactly what I want.
This feels like a dream come true. Really amazing.
Re: DaVinci Resolve – Photo
#7Wow, this looks incredible- Capture One has really not been innovating, is slow, the library can’t handle 40k raws, and with Lightroom, edits seem slightly worse.
The cinematic color grading seems super cool, can’t wait to give this a try.
Re: DaVinci Resolve – Photo
#8[flagged]
Re: DaVinci Resolve – Photo
#9This looks good.
I’ve returned to Canon Desktop photo Pro for processing raw, but it’s clunky and Windows and only does canon raw (though I kind of get that). I’m trying DXO on windows some good gpu acceleration, but no Linux. I’ve moved most of my work to Linux, and I did try raw therapy and darktable but it wasn’t intuitive enough and i had to tweak a lot. I’ll pay for a light room alternative (which I bought years ago.. they don’t support new cameras which is how they get you to upgrade.)
Re: DaVinci Resolve – Photo
#10How do they actual make money? I've been using Resolve for years without paying for it (and without thinking about its business model too much). It seems that they sell quite expensive professional hardware so I assume the software users are just compensated by hardware users?