X Randomly Banning Users for "Inauthentic Behavior"
11–20 of 97 posts
Re: X Randomly Banning Users for "Inauthentic Behavior"
#12[flagged]
Perhaps for related reasons, I've also recently heard Elon Musk being described as a "literal Nazi" a lot, and I'm sure that kind of wild rhetoric has a similar backfire effect with anyone who has any familiarity with him.
Re: X Randomly Banning Users for "Inauthentic Behavior"
#13[flagged]
X has the best AI news, the best virality for good content and sure - it has a lot of shit, but community notes and curated feeds keep the noise low.
Re: X Randomly Banning Users for "Inauthentic Behavior"
#14I used to follow only cycling/urban related accounts for the town I live in. Most of them left, so maybe that's making it hard for the algorithm, but my feed is now just far right immigration propaganda by blue checks, or lots of US issues (I'm not in the US). Not a nice place to be, but I can see how it can be addicting / trigger something in the brain.
Re: X Randomly Banning Users for "Inauthentic Behavior"
#15At the end I just deleted it and created an account into Bluesky instead.
Re: X Randomly Banning Users for "Inauthentic Behavior"
#16[flagged]
The classic "if it disagrees with me, it's a far-right neo-Nazi" rhetoric. Sadly thiss is becoming depressingly common in certain corners of tech discourse. X has the best AI news, the best virality for good content and sure - it has a lot of shit, but community notes and curated feeds keep the noise low.
Re: X Randomly Banning Users for "Inauthentic Behavior"
#17"X" is in a weird place now. The monetization of engagement absolutely wrecked the feeds from my cursory glance. Just ragebaiting, vague posting, abuse (for a while, every female posting would have someone in the replies doing "grok, put OP in a bikini" and it would post sexualized images of them). Someone vent viral by posting a picture of Steve Jobs' daughter (?), and people try to replicate that as that now genera…
I get these tweets randomly in my Timeline as well. What I don't understand is why does Twitter think I should know about someone asking Grok to put xxx in Bikini
Re: X Randomly Banning Users for "Inauthentic Behavior"
#18"X" is in a weird place now. The monetization of engagement absolutely wrecked the feeds from my cursory glance. Just ragebaiting, vague posting, abuse (for a while, every female posting would have someone in the replies doing "grok, put OP in a bikini" and it would post sexualized images of them). Someone vent viral by posting a picture of Steve Jobs' daughter (?), and people try to replicate that as that now genera…
> every female posting would have someone in the replies doing "grok, put OP in a bikini" I get these tweets randomly in my Timeline as well. What I don't understand is why does Twitter think I should know about someone asking Grok to put xxx in Bikini
Re: X Randomly Banning Users for "Inauthentic Behavior"
#19[flagged]
The classic "if it disagrees with me, it's a far-right neo-Nazi" rhetoric. Sadly thiss is becoming depressingly common in certain corners of tech discourse. X has the best AI news, the best virality for good content and sure - it has a lot of shit, but community notes and curated feeds keep the noise low.
Other places are like playgrounds, X is where the adults go to talk.
Re: X Randomly Banning Users for "Inauthentic Behavior"
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
> every female posting would have someone in the replies doing "grok, put OP in a bikini" I get these tweets randomly in my Timeline as well. What I don't understand is why does Twitter think I should know about someone asking Grok to put xxx in Bikini
This is a command to the Grok bot and used to generate an image based on the post and that specific prompt. After significant outrage they disabled it for non-paying users at least, not sure if they changed more about this later.