Live data from Hacker News

Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

blog.samaltman.com

341–350 of 1001 posts

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I categorically reject that assertion. Two simple examples: 1) when you see someone assaulting someone else, it's absolutely ok to attack them, and 2) the American revolution! It's like that old joke: A man offers a young woman $1,000,000 to sleep with him for one night. “For a million dollars? Sure, I’ll sleep with you.” He smiles at her, “How about $50, then?” “How dare you! I’m not a whore!” “Look, lady, we’ve alr…

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#343
post #294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you grind people into a paste long enough, eventually some of them may object in one manner or another.

I’m sorry, which specific people were “ground into paste” and when?

Everyone too poor to thrive.

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#344

Can someone help me to understand why OpenAI and Anthropic talks as if the future of humanity controlled by them? We have very strong open (weight) Chinese models possibly only 6 months behind of them, gene is out of the bottle, is 6 months of difference really that important? And they don’t have good reasons for that 6 months to stay that way. Am I missing something or are these just their usual marketing? I’m not a…

Do any of the open weight models from smaller labs exist if they can't distill from the SoTA models that are throwing billions of dollars of compute into pretraining?

I’ve been wondering the same. And I think pretty much all the impressive small lab models were guilty of it, right? At least there is still larger players like DeepSeek and mistral to provide a bit of diversity in the market

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#346
He says power can't be too concentrated - but even n-2 generation models are not open.

He says "look at me I love my family" - so do the millions of people who think his company may destroy the economy and help corporations and the trillionaires put a boot to our children's necks.

3:45am in the morning - no dip, that's what AM is.

---

Someone here asked "How do we get to post scarcity from here?" and someone else said "no one knows".

The AI barons are loading up their bank accounts and political capital, driving us off a cliff and promising we'll learn to fly by the time we get there. But they're going to tuck and roll out of the driver's seat.

Sam, why do you expect us to believe anything you say when you have done nothing to lead the discussion about universal rights for citizens in a post scarcity society?

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#347
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

10 hours ago a post made the frontpage here [0] about how OpenAI is backing a law that "would limit liability for AI-enabled mass deaths or financial disasters". Now he's here saying he believes that "working towards prosperity for everyone, empowering all people, and advancing science and technology are moral obligations for [him]". I know he doesn't believe a word of what he wrote in that post except, perhaps, that…

[flagged]

People championing the absolution of billionaires who create a chatbot that can't spell strawberry who then say it should be allowed to choose who lives and dies wasn't what I expected at the turn of the decade.

Beautiful.

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#349

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a marketing strategy. If it's almost certainly conscious and capable of ending the world if it desired (even if it isn't), imagine how good it could be at building your dream SaaS!

Anthropic in particular does this masterfully, you’d think they’d invented Skynet by the way they hand-wring. As always what matters are actions and evidence, not talk.

I’ll believe Anthropic when they fire everyone making more than the cost of a few GPUs. Until then, it’s just marketing.

Re: Sam Altman's response to Molotov cocktail incident

#350

[flagged]

Altman didn't create AI. That disruption is already coming no matter what. He's a fine enough steward of the tech. And what's this garbage about selling to the military? You pay taxes? You fund the military. Without security you can't protect your nation or your allies, and enemy nations would do as they please. Yet another citizen who benefits from a system while trying to attack it.

> He's a fine enough steward of the tech.

Are you Sam Altman?

Post reply on HN