Live data from Hacker News

Nowhere is safe

steveblank.com

21–30 of 329 posts

Re: Nowhere is safe

#21

I find this vaguely analogous to the proliferation of cheap handguns in America. If drones are a response to asymmetrical power, the solution would be diplomacy. It undermines existing power paradigm, the solution isnn't complicated. Don't pick needless fights with your neighbors and allies. Maybe drones ultimately make better neighbors.

This is the "people are more respectful when everyone is armed" theory.

I think handguns in the US has shown that it doesn't work.

Re: Nowhere is safe

#22
post #9

I often see these angles, how we should have prepared better or attacked this instead of that, or the unexpected strategy from the adversary. What about not bombing? The best safety trick the US can use is not bombing others.

Well yes, and actually instead of wasting billions creating understandable cause of hate, this could be injected into domestic social spendings, and there would probably still be a lot staying on the table to throw in humanitarian endeavors around the globe creating love through so called soft power.

Re: Nowhere is safe

#23
The trouble with missile interceptors is that they're overkill. Drones are slow, unarmored targets that could be taken out by a bullet.

What you need is small automated point-defense turrets, mounted on whatever you want to protect.

Re: Nowhere is safe

#24

Hmm... Interestingly one does not look at the solutions to de-escalate conflict. Despite the proxy wars we've had a relatively peaceful world since WW1/WW2. Please humor me here, I'm not saying the world is horror free. The emphasis I would hope would also be for improved negotiation tactics, better resource sharing and goal alignment between groups of people. Why is it that we can dream up more conflict but not peac…

The US spends more on its military than the next 10 countries combined.

When all you have is a hammer…

Re: Nowhere is safe

#25
There is a layer over this that should be noticed. Nowhere is safe, because international order is a joke. You can conduct invasions for land, to exterminate population, to whatever Trump is doing, every instrument of international law was just useless, or even cooperative with the stronger offender. Which will be the ones taking advantage of this situation? China, Brazil?

Everything is forgotten or accepted with the right media campaign, there are no war crimes, no punishment, as much you can get a commercial embargo or taxes if you are going against the interest of the biggest economic players.

Re: Nowhere is safe

#26
I think it would be really interesting to study the costs/ benefits of digging a tunnel 10 meters underground compared to placing a sturdy building where you want it, and using bulldozers to cover it with 10 meters of earth and rock.

Re: Nowhere is safe

#27
post #9

I often see these angles, how we should have prepared better or attacked this instead of that, or the unexpected strategy from the adversary. What about not bombing? The best safety trick the US can use is not bombing others.

The US is a country of violence and war. Founded from a war, massive civil war, almost perpetually at war for the last many decades.

Military spending costs a trillion a year (Trump wants 1.5 trillion). It’s big business and makes some people very rich.

Re: Nowhere is safe

#28
post #3

The first part of the parabellum quote matters - we have to let the people who want peace prepare for war. The Smedly Butler book was eye opening to read for me. Diplomacy and trade works wonders when the enemy still wants you to buy things. Sanctions work when they've got things to sell (and raw materials to buy), not bombed out craters where their factories were. Si vis pacem ...

aposiopesis is followed presumably by some latin phrasing of prepare for war?

[edit, found the real version https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Si_vis_pacem%2C_para_bellum ]

adapted from a statement found in Roman author Publius Flavius Vegetius Renatus's tract De Re Militari (fourth or fifth century AD), in which the actual phrasing is Igitur qui desiderat pacem, præparet bellum ("Therefore let him who desires peace prepare for war").

Re: Nowhere is safe

#29

How about not attacking countries and then you don't have to worry about them attacking you?

You must not have read any history books.

The ones written by the empires, or the ones that empires throw in the fire with anyone that dare to pretend otherwise? :)

Re: Nowhere is safe

#30

Hmm... Interestingly one does not look at the solutions to de-escalate conflict. Despite the proxy wars we've had a relatively peaceful world since WW1/WW2. Please humor me here, I'm not saying the world is horror free. The emphasis I would hope would also be for improved negotiation tactics, better resource sharing and goal alignment between groups of people. Why is it that we can dream up more conflict but not peac…

The US spends more on its military than the next 10 countries combined. When all you have is a hammer…

I mean we could just go back to talk softly and carry a big stick. There are options between pacifism and boisterous rabble rousing and picking fights that don't particularly need to be fought without good plans.
Post reply on HN