Live data from Hacker News

A compelling title that is cryptic enough to get you to take action on it

ericwbailey.website

11–20 of 159 posts

Re: A compelling title that is cryptic enough to get you to take action on it

#11
post #3

A simple statement of acknowledgement. > a quote from the article A link to something relevant or interesting to add or support a point [1] An opinionated comment or personal anecdote. [1] the link from above

>> a quote from the article > An opinionated comment or personal anecdote. Counter opinion or added nuance. [1] [1] A link for support or to demonstrate a counterexample.

An uncalled-for ad hominem that serves to quickly devolve the discussion in opinionated ragebait.

Re: A compelling title that is cryptic enough to get you to take action on it

#13

A simple statement of acknowledgement. > a quote from the article A link to something relevant or interesting to add or support a point [1] An opinionated comment or personal anecdote. [1] the link from above

A reply which references neither the parent comment nor the article, but makes a strong and likely negative statement.

Re: A compelling title that is cryptic enough to get you to take action on it

#18
Feels similar with cold email.I used to think it was mostly about better copy or subject lines, but lately it feels like timing matters way more. Same message, different moment, completely different outcome.

Have you seen cases where timing mattered more than the message itself?

Re: A compelling title that is cryptic enough to get you to take action on it

#19

A comment complaining this was obviously written by an AI, and the standard template is a tell. A philosophical observation about what that says about the state on online discourse. Link to the Dead Internet Wikipedia page.

A response appreciating the comment above for saving ones time.

Re: A compelling title that is cryptic enough to get you to take action on it

#20

A comment based on the reading of the title that could only be conceived if the commenter didn't bother to click the article at all.

A snide and vitriolic remark that observes on how the first paragraph actually addresses the concern of the person which hasn't read the article. A further continuation on this being representative of the state of modern online discourse.
Post reply on HN