Wouldn't the step/foster bit already be covered by child pornography laws?
Peers vote to ban pornography depicting sex acts between stepfamily members
11–20 of 101 posts
Re: Peers vote to ban pornography depicting sex acts between stepfamily members
#12Re: Peers vote to ban pornography depicting sex acts between stepfamily members
#13This comment section will inevitably fill up with comments from people who have exactly the same thing to say, namely, that internet censorship is bad. That opinion has transcended the good-take-bad-take dichotomy: it's entered the pantheon of ideas that are seamlessly dumped into any mildly-related discussion and act as an impediment to any more interesting ideas. Here's a more interesting idea: because the pornogra…
Re: Peers vote to ban pornography depicting sex acts between stepfamily members
#14Some ministers had opposed the amendment and suggested the new ban would have been difficult to implement because, under the law in England and Wales, it is not illegal for adults who are step-related to engage in a sexual relationship. This is amusing to me. Legal to do, but not legal to film.
"Selling is legal, and fucking is legal; but selling fucking is not legal."
Re: Peers vote to ban pornography depicting sex acts between stepfamily members
#15Re: Peers vote to ban pornography depicting sex acts between stepfamily members
#16Re: Peers vote to ban pornography depicting sex acts between stepfamily members
#17Re: Peers vote to ban pornography depicting sex acts between stepfamily members
#18[flagged]
Re: Peers vote to ban pornography depicting sex acts between stepfamily members
#19Are there not much more objectionable fetishes than this one?