Live data from Hacker News

France to ditch Windows for Linux to reduce reliance on US tech

techcrunch.com

321–330 of 729 posts

Re: France to ditch Windows for Linux to reduce reliance on US tech

#321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well actually I've been technically playing all the games that are protected by these aggressive anticheats on linux since I've decided to switch. My setup is a custom version of the linux kernel that 'backdoors' itself and exposes host information to the windows vm making all the anticheats happy enough to work out of the box. Have not gotten banned in any of the games either. Custom VMM and EDK builds are required…

That is honestly amazing and impressive. Probably a bit too much tweaking for the common gamer though, but glad it is possible!

I've been messing with kernel-mode anticheats for 3 to 4 years so yah, not something a typical gamer can do. But I have been contempating on making this publically available for everyone to use wrapped in a neat little package!

Re: France to ditch Windows for Linux to reduce reliance on US tech

#322

All the comments about Linux gaming make me want to give my $0.02. I've been gaming on Linux, with no Windows installed anywhere, for around 6 years. In the first 3 years, it was a massive pain. Games like S.T.A.L.K.E.R. would consistently have issues with mouse input, weird acceleration, a lot of games wouldn't run at all. This is NO LONGER the case at all. Things run very well out of the box. All games I want to pl…

Well actually I've been technically playing all the games that are protected by these aggressive anticheats on linux since I've decided to switch. My setup is a custom version of the linux kernel that 'backdoors' itself and exposes host information to the windows vm making all the anticheats happy enough to work out of the box. Have not gotten banned in any of the games either. Custom VMM and EDK builds are required…

Care to write it up somewhere? Would be a fascinating read!

Re: France to ditch Windows for Linux to reduce reliance on US tech

#323
Will the French government view open source software as software which should be well-funded and well structured, ie Blender level quality and organization, or are they going to underfund it and thus have it succumb to the shenanigans of Redhat, aka IBM, the infamous pushers of Gnome and Wayland?

Re: France to ditch Windows for Linux to reduce reliance on US tech

#324

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Games like S.T.A.L.K.E.R. The old stalker games run on the X-Ray engine (the mods on a modified OSS version of it). In my experience they've always worked pretty well, though the games are quirky in general. Good hunting stalker.

No wonder it's classified informally as "eurojank".

We still can't compete with Bethesda on that front, though...

Re: France to ditch Windows for Linux to reduce reliance on US tech

#325

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It's nuts Windows is still the go-to for anything these days despite everyone knowing what a parasitic Linux still doesn't have anywhere near as nice and cohesive as Group Policy, Active Directory etc. Plus you can pay Microsoft to host it all for you on Azure.

I've never understood the management thing. People manage fleets of Linux machines all the time. What does group policy do that e.g. nix or ansible don't?

Group policy just sets registry keys. That's nothing you can't do any other way. The important bit is the inertia of 30 years of Windows subsystems and integration with Active Directory and 3rd party Windows ecosystem software all being written to expose internal config and look to registry keys for the settings.

For the first part, Group Policy (GPO) can set the screen to lock after 2 minutes of inactivity, say, which works because there are Windows subsystems built to look for a reg key for their config, and policy templates exposing that config in the GUI management tools. Or group policy configures which security group can "logon as a service" which works because Windows has system-wide and domain-wide pervasive Access Control Lists (ACLs). GPO configures that Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) should limit its bandwidth use, which works because Windows Updates use BITS. Or sets the machine-wide SSL cipher order, because Windows software uses system-wide schannel not OpenSSL. Or GPO sets what your default printer will be and that's only useful because decades of 3rd party Windows software was written to use the standard Windows printer dialog, or User Documents path, or whatever.

For the second part, Active Directory is a tree-shaped organization tool; in screenshot[5] that I quickly Googled, the tree on the left has a folder named "Sydney" and below that "Sydney Users"; this lets sysadmins organise the company computer accounts, user accounts, and security groups by whatever hierarchy makes sense for that company - e.g. by country, office, team, department, building floor, etc. Then Group Policy overlays on that structure, and the policies are composable.

e.g. in this basic screenshot of the group policy manamement GUI[6] it's showing at the bottom a list of all group policy configurations that have been made in a domain such as "Block PowerShell", and higher up it shows the policy "PsExec Allow" has been linked inside the "ADPRO Computers" folder. So users and computers in that folder in AD, will get those policies applied. In screenshot[7] you can see a basic example showing corporate computers getting machine-wide settings, corporate users getting user-level MS Office config, and Executives get settings that nobody else gets. (This echoes the registry having separate HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE and HKEY_CURRENT_USER subtrees). Screenshot[8] shows the relatively tidy GUI on the right for seeing which settings have been configured in a policy.

If you apply more than one GPO to a folder, the users/computers will get the all the policy settings combined. This is often what people complain about when logging on to a corporate Windows machine takes ages, btw. You can filter GPOs on a case-by-case basis to build patterns like "apply this machine-wide policy to all computers in the Sydney folder which are members of the WarehouseComputer security group" or "apply these logon-settings to employees in New York who are members of Finance and logging onto a laptop". So companies which have been around for years can have really (messy) big and intricate designs which would be a lot of work to migrate.

3rd party programs can release XML files which plug into the GPO management, and the programs were written to expect to be configured by registry keys so they can pick up those settings; there are templates for configuring FireFox[1], Chrome[2] Adobe Acrobat[3], Word, Excel, Office[4], VMWare Horizon, Lenovo Dock Manager, Zoom, RealVNC, LibreOffice, Citrix, FoxIT Reader, and so on. The more enterprisey a tool is, the more likely it will plug into that ecosystem. Then all kinds of 3rd party reporting and auditing tools look there to see if your company is compliant with this or that; the whole thing is integrated with Windows' domain-wide ACLs so you can give some admins permissions to view or edit just their regional subset of this.

As usual the lockin is not that they do something amazing that nothing else can do, the lockin is that Windows domains have been around in this format for 30 years since NT4 and Windows 2000, and it has huge inertia, familiarity, is deeply embedded in a lot of companies, you can easily and cheaply hire lots of people who know how to use and manage it, you can send screenshots of it to auditors and they understand it, if you don't know how but you have a bit of (oldschool) Windows experience then clicking around will get you the basics, you can buy 3rd party auditing software that will send you a management friendly report with green ticks saying almost everything is fine but you should change this setting for security...

[Yes of course you can build your own custom replacement for every single thing, just like you can build your own custom replacement for any software; it's "just" ldap and kerberos and dns and some scripts and site-to-site policy replication and management tools und und und].

[1] https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/customizing-firefox-usi...

[2] https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/187202?hl=en

[3] https://www.adobe.com/devnet-docs/acrobatetk/tools/DesktopDe...

[4] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=490...

[5] https://www.windows-active-directory.com/wp-content/uploads/...

[6] https://activedirectorypro.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/gp...

[7] https://www.varonis.com/hs-fs/hubfs/blog%20posts/Group%20Pol...

[8] https://redmondmag.com/articles/2016/01/12/~/media/ecg/redmo...

Re: France to ditch Windows for Linux to reduce reliance on US tech

#326

All the comments about Linux gaming make me want to give my $0.02. I've been gaming on Linux, with no Windows installed anywhere, for around 6 years. In the first 3 years, it was a massive pain. Games like S.T.A.L.K.E.R. would consistently have issues with mouse input, weird acceleration, a lot of games wouldn't run at all. This is NO LONGER the case at all. Things run very well out of the box. All games I want to pl…

> Things run very well out of the box.

> a good number of wheels, pedals, joysticks, VR headsets, and other wild and wacky input devices might not work that well or not at all

> If a game has an aggressive anticheat, like Battlefield 6 or Valorant, it will not work and you can forget about it

> Not sure about VR, but I know it was a bit dire 1-2 years ago

The determination of the average Linux user to ignore the faults of Linux is something to behold

Re: France to ditch Windows for Linux to reduce reliance on US tech

#328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Imagine what can happen if the French and other governments would start pouring all the money into developing that further in the open, rather than just giving it all to Microsoft instead?

Most of the cost (to the government) for Windows is "support" (in a very general sense) and that cost isn't disappearing with Linux. Especially since it is easier to find badly underpaid (and not particularly competent) Windows sysadmins than it is to find badly underpaid Linux admins.

I don't think that cost is what is mostly driving the move from Windows nowadays.

Re: France to ditch Windows for Linux to reduce reliance on US tech

#329
I puzzles me to no end why the typical office clerk should care about the OS at all. I understand that secretaries will be trained on MS Word and will then have a strong preference to use such (or at least something which very closely resembles it). Same for accountants with Excel. But clerks in e.g. Revenue Service? Those I expect to interact (perhaps these days via a Web interface) with custom software. Why would those ever see a 'Start' button or somesuch?

Re: France to ditch Windows for Linux to reduce reliance on US tech

#330

All the comments about Linux gaming make me want to give my $0.02. I've been gaming on Linux, with no Windows installed anywhere, for around 6 years. In the first 3 years, it was a massive pain. Games like S.T.A.L.K.E.R. would consistently have issues with mouse input, weird acceleration, a lot of games wouldn't run at all. This is NO LONGER the case at all. Things run very well out of the box. All games I want to pl…

> Things run very well out of the box. > a good number of wheels, pedals, joysticks, VR headsets, and other wild and wacky input devices might not work that well or not at all > If a game has an aggressive anticheat, like Battlefield 6 or Valorant, it will not work and you can forget about it > Not sure about VR, but I know it was a bit dire 1-2 years ago The determination of the average Linux user to ignore the faul…

Aggressive anticheat not supporting Linux is not a fault of Linux. It is a fault of the aggressive anticheat and the games that decide to use it.
Post reply on HN