Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, no, that's an insane claim to make. Obviously American education covers some information about religion in history classes, but that level of detail about catholic history is not normal curriculum for elementary, middle, or high school.
I am not talking about what American education covers nor the average American. But what people with an interest in History, who are reading history books, watching history documentaries, etc. would know. Avignon is not that deep.
The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
231–240 of 332 posts
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#232Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's this weird affect of modern "trad" catholic converts. Not everyone who's an adult convert acts this way, but most converts obsessed with "trad" aesthetics seem to be. They obsess over the law, doctrine, and history of the Catholic church. Invoking events from millennia prior, and despite converting to Catholicism by choice, will denounce the Pope for being woke or what have you, insisting it's not the true Ca…
Religious sects that have branched off is sort of an American thing from its very founding. Not sure if the New World was attractive or the Old Wold needed to rid itself of the chaos. The effect was the same.
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#233I have recently deepened my search in Christianity which started with the Catholic Church, one of few points I struggle with when it comes to Catholicism is the papacy, and the Avignon Papacy debacle and the events that followed (a la Western Schism) has quite a bit to do with that. I was a little confused by what they meant here by “threatening with the Avignon Papacy.” If anyone else is curious, I think the phrase…
If you like Catholicism but struggle with the papacy, have you considered Eastern Orthodoxy?
Jokes aside, there are only a couple in my area and they are ripe with tribalism and hard to approach. Appreciate your recommendation, though.
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#234Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eh I'd expect any diplomat to have the historical knowledge to reference important Church events, especially if there's time to prepare before speaking with church representatives. It was a very significant political period in Catholic history!
You expect this administration to rely on domain experts? Can you give some examples of this?
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#235Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is exactly my observation. Every now and then there's an Anglo posting on Polish social media asking people questions about some obscure Catholic doctrines and getting offended after they're told that no one there cares. I guess that such people see the number "98% Catholic" on the page for Poland on Wikipedia and conclude that it must be some medieval tradcath white nationalist theocracy. I am deeply skeptical…
> Anglo Please, write US-American. These people are not coming from any other place.
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#236Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am not talking about what American education covers nor the average American. But what people with an interest in History, who are reading history books, watching history documentaries, etc. would know. Avignon is not that deep.
You literally started: "Any middle schooler...", and now you claim you aren't discussing education?
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#237Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eh I'd expect any diplomat to have the historical knowledge to reference important Church events, especially if there's time to prepare before speaking with church representatives. It was a very significant political period in Catholic history!
If you would expect a typical Trump political appointee, as Colby is, to have even basic historical knowledge, then you may not be paying close attention.
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#238Earlier quoted context omitted.
AI, Politics, Social Media, and indifference have all played their part. It’s not just the administration. The administration just knows how to manipulate those things.
I would reluctantly have to agree. The current administration is the culmination of something like 30 years of effort.
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#239Wow. I knew the current administration was bad but this is something extra. It also shows the short-sightedness of the "scholars" in the administration. Sure, the Avignon Papacy did occur, that's historical fact. It's also a historical fact that the Catholic Church is an actually ancient power broker in the world still and they have been around for much, much longer than the United States. The Church is actually quit…
AI, Politics, Social Media, and indifference have all played their part. It’s not just the administration. The administration just knows how to manipulate those things.
Re: The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV's Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy
#240I have recently deepened my search in Christianity which started with the Catholic Church, one of few points I struggle with when it comes to Catholicism is the papacy, and the Avignon Papacy debacle and the events that followed (a la Western Schism) has quite a bit to do with that. I was a little confused by what they meant here by “threatening with the Avignon Papacy.” If anyone else is curious, I think the phrase…
As a Catholic, I understood the reference to Avignon Papacy to mean the US will create a separate papacy, distinct from Leo and under the control of Trump.
Putin already owns one, and King Charles III is one. C'mon, everybody is doing it!