Live data from Hacker News

More likely than not you're using bubble wrap wrong

bookofjoe2.blogspot.com

1–10 of 19 posts

Re: More likely than not you're using bubble wrap wrong

#8
post #5

My guess is that the flat side provides a better surface for distributing pressure so long as the thing you are wrapping isn't a porcupine.

Well, the most obvious thing would be that the airpockets created by in-between the bubbles _have to_ be on the inside next to the item, otherwise there is no air pockets at all, so obviously the bubbles most face inwards.

That's how I was thinking about it before this article at least.

Re: More likely than not you're using bubble wrap wrong

#9
post #5

My guess is that the flat side provides a better surface for distributing pressure so long as the thing you are wrapping isn't a porcupine.

Mine as well.

Imagine a small enough object, like a tip of a screwdriver, or a table's corner, touching an object wrapped bubbles out.

It simply makes contact with the object - here covered with only a very thin layer of plastic - between the bubbles, and given enough force, damages the object.

With bubbles inwards, it has to pierce or stretch the now airgapped layer of plastic first.

Even with multiple layers, bubbles inside give +1 airgapped layer.

Re: More likely than not you're using bubble wrap wrong

#10

I am ironically disappointed to learn that I have always been using bubble wrap correctly.

If it makes you feel better, I can tell you that using any form of plastic for shipping safety is bad and you should feel bad about it, because we have better alternatives like paper or even mycelium-based packaging matreials?
Post reply on HN