Live data from Hacker News

Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter

braw.dev

121–130 of 265 posts

Re: Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It doesn't know if 1 person made all those requests, or N. FWIW this is highly unlikely to be true. It's true that the upstream provider won't know it's _you_ per se, but most LLM providers strongly encourage proxies like OpenRouter to distinguish between downstream clients for security and performance reasons. For example: - https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/safety-best-pr... - https://developers.opena…

Fair point. Would be good to hear from OpenRouter folks on how they handle the safety identifier. For prompt caching, they already say they permit it, and do not consider it "logging" (i.e. if you have zero retention turned on, it will still go to providers who do prompt caching).

OpenRouter tells you if they submit with your user ID or anonymously if you hover over one of the icons on the provider, eg OpenAI has "OpenRouter submits API requests to this provider with an anonymous user ID.", Azure OpenAI on the other hand has "OpenRouter submits API requests to this provider anonymously.".

Re: Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter

#122
post #13

People may feel differently about the fee that OpenRouter takes, but I think the service they provide is worth the extra cost. Having access to dozens of models through a single API key, tracking cost of each request, being able to run the same request on different models and comparing their results next to each other, separating usages through different API keys, adding your own presets, setting your routing rules..…

I agree with you in certain circumstances, but not really for internal user inference. OpenRouter is great if you need to maintain uptime, but for basic usage (chat/coding/self-agents) you can do all of what you mentioned and more with a LiteLLM instance. The number of companies that send a bill is rarely a concern when it comes to “is work getting done”, but I agree with you that minimizing user friction is best. Fo…

[deleted]

Re: Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter

#123

I have had credits on open router that haven’t been deleted since near the projects launch, I believe 365 days is not a rule but rather a right reserved.

COO of OpenRouter here. Thats right — we haven’t done it to date but we can’t have unlimited liabilities stacking up forever. At some point we will start expiring credits from accounts that have seen zero activity in over a year.

[dead]

Re: Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter

#125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fair point. Would be good to hear from OpenRouter folks on how they handle the safety identifier. For prompt caching, they already say they permit it, and do not consider it "logging" (i.e. if you have zero retention turned on, it will still go to providers who do prompt caching).

OpenRouter tells you if they submit with your user ID or anonymously if you hover over one of the icons on the provider, eg OpenAI has "OpenRouter submits API requests to this provider with an anonymous user ID.", Azure OpenAI on the other hand has "OpenRouter submits API requests to this provider anonymously.".

But does "anonymous user ID" mean that they make a user ID for you, and it's sticky? If I make a request today and another tomorrow, the same anonymous user ID is sent each time? Or do they keep changing it?

Re: Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter

#126
post #68

My 50c - ollama cloud 20$. GLM5 and kimi are really competitive models, Ollama usage limits insane high, no limits where to use (has normal APIs), privacy and no logging

yeah? why do you like that over using GLM5 in a VPS that charges by token use? $20 still cheaper and seamless to set up? how are the tokens per second?

Re: Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter

#127
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I haven't tried $20 claude code recently, but I've used OpenCode Zen primarily so I can play with opensource/chinese models which are very inexpensive. I'd spend $0.50-$1.00 on a single claude opus 4.6 plan mode run, then have a chinese model execute the plan for like $0.10-$0.15 total. I'd keep context short, constantly start new threads, and get laser focused markdown plans and knowledgebase to be token efficient.…

Which chinese models do you use and do you use any for specific tasks?

kimi k2.5 works quite well and is super fast. Much faster than opus but not quite at the same quality level.

Re: Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter

#128
I just tried Zed with Gemma 4 to see how it does with local models. Impressive speed and quality for the small model with thinking off (E4B). Very slow for the big model with thinking turned on. We'll see if this is better than my current tools (primary is Codex CLI plus qwen3 coder next) but the first impression is good. Especially nice that it configured all of my ollama models automatically.

Re: Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter

#129

On the topic of Zed itself as a VSCode replacement - my experience is mixed. I loved it at first, but with time the papercuts add up. The responsiveness difference isn't that big on my system, but Zed's memory usage (with the TS language server in particular) is scandalous. As far as DX goes it's probably at 85% of the level VSCode provides, but in this space QoL features matter a lot. Oh, and it still can't render e…

QoL features is where WebStorm shines! I don't look forward to when I have to open vscode instead sometimes.

Just the floating and ephemeral "Search in files" modal in Jetbrain IDEs would convince me to switch from any other IDE.

Re: Reallocating $100/Month Claude Code Spend to Zed and OpenRouter

#130
post #35

I also dropped Claude Code Max. I switched to OpenCode Zen + GitHub Copilot. For some reason, Claude Code burns through my quota really quickly. https://opencode.ai/zen

I dislike how Zen (and many similar cases, not picking on Zen here) report being not for profit or transparent, while the auto-recharge mechanism guarantees they are sitting on a float of at least $5 per account, and presumably an average of at least $10. That's something like 50 cents of interest income per year per account. It's not nothing and it's hardly egregious fraud, but I feel if they will do this when it's obvious what they're doing, what other corners might they cut

Honesty as a marketing strategy is really undervalued in cases like this

Post reply on HN