Earlier quoted context omitted.
What features would you welcome?
Also "unread comment highlighting" would be so good to have.
Show HN: Orange Juice – Small UX improvements that make HN easier to read
71–80 of 165 posts
Re: Show HN: Orange Juice – Small UX improvements that make HN easier to read
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
Refined hasn't received an update in 4 years. https://github.com/plibither8/refined-hacker-news/issues/135... I used refined for years as well. Great product, but the underlying code was meh, and the author abandoned it. If you're using refined today, you're experiencing a lot of bugs as the HN DOM has changed over time. I maintained my own fork for a long time but finally motivated myself to try out AI assisted codi…
I just tried switching from a slightly more updated fork of Refined Hacker News (2025)[1] One thing I miss is the orange mark identifying the OP of a post. [1]: https://github.com/alexferrari88/refined-hacker-news
https://github.com/OrangeJuiceExtension/OrangeJuice/blob/b84...
Re: Show HN: Orange Juice – Small UX improvements that make HN easier to read
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Refined hasn't received an update in 4 years. https://github.com/plibither8/refined-hacker-news/issues/135... I used refined for years as well. Great product, but the underlying code was meh, and the author abandoned it. If you're using refined today, you're experiencing a lot of bugs as the HN DOM has changed over time. I maintained my own fork for a long time but finally motivated myself to try out AI assisted codi…
I tried contacting the author to see if he would open source it but he's gone dark and doesn't seem to really exist on the Internet anymore. So I grabbed the source code and modernised it, added additional feature and it's what I've been using ever since. I haven't open sourced it out of respect for the original author however the software does not actually have any license that prevents it so I have been considering…
It's MIT-licensed open source.
I've been using a fork (also MIT): https://github.com/alexferrari88/refined-hacker-news
Re: Show HN: Orange Juice – Small UX improvements that make HN easier to read
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
Refined hasn't received an update in 4 years. https://github.com/plibither8/refined-hacker-news/issues/135... I used refined for years as well. Great product, but the underlying code was meh, and the author abandoned it. If you're using refined today, you're experiencing a lot of bugs as the HN DOM has changed over time. I maintained my own fork for a long time but finally motivated myself to try out AI assisted codi…
I tried contacting the author to see if he would open source it but he's gone dark and doesn't seem to really exist on the Internet anymore. So I grabbed the source code and modernised it, added additional feature and it's what I've been using ever since. I haven't open sourced it out of respect for the original author however the software does not actually have any license that prevents it so I have been considering…
Re: Show HN: Orange Juice – Small UX improvements that make HN easier to read
#75Re: Show HN: Orange Juice – Small UX improvements that make HN easier to read
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just tried switching from a slightly more updated fork of Refined Hacker News (2025)[1] One thing I miss is the orange mark identifying the OP of a post. [1]: https://github.com/alexferrari88/refined-hacker-news
I have that in there. https://github.com/OrangeJuiceExtension/OrangeJuice/blob/b84...
There was no [OP] label when I first reloaded this page, and now after replying, I am marked as the [OP].
edit: it seems the [OP] relies on a URL hash with the ID of the OP. However, this doesn't work for me because I don't navigate to HN posts from the HN site.
I usually come from https://hn.leftium.com. (Or a page like https://hw.leftium.com/#/item/47694036)
Re: Show HN: Orange Juice – Small UX improvements that make HN easier to read
#77Latchkey, would you be comfortable with HN adopting your dark mode styling as a user choice someday, if they came around to liking it? I really like it and I think it’s in the spirit of the site.
Thanks! A lot of it is AI with my own input, but I think it did a great job. The code is all open source and people can do with it what they want. It is GPLv3, but I'd special license it to them as MIT without question.
Nice work, nevertheless, and useful!
Re: Show HN: Orange Juice – Small UX improvements that make HN easier to read
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have that in there. https://github.com/OrangeJuiceExtension/OrangeJuice/blob/b84...
Ah, I see it must be the bug mentioned in another thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695328 There was no [OP] label when I first reloaded this page, and now after replying, I am marked as the [OP]. edit: it seems the [OP] relies on a URL hash with the ID of the OP. However, this doesn't work for me because I don't navigate to HN posts from the HN site. I usually come from https://hn.leftium.com . (Or a pa…
https://github.com/plibither8/refined-hacker-news/blob/ee7ef...
Re: Show HN: Orange Juice – Small UX improvements that make HN easier to read
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks! A lot of it is AI with my own input, but I think it did a great job. The code is all open source and people can do with it what they want. It is GPLv3, but I'd special license it to them as MIT without question.
Well, if it's AI-generated, it's not really copyrighted by you and you cannot license it under GPL, since you did not write it. Nice work, nevertheless, and useful!
Re: Show HN: Orange Juice – Small UX improvements that make HN easier to read
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're not really answering the question. That's the bundle size, not the amount of code in the project. I've done nothing to try to optimize the bundle size, but I suspect that a lot of it has to do with some of the third party dependencies like mermaid.
Well, i downloaded firefox extension and checked the size of only *.js files without any additional assests - and it's 2 megabytes. Mermaid is around 800kb, so it still leaves over 1 megabyte of javascript. The amount of abstraction alone for the project of this scope makes me cringe. You introduce unnecessary complexity.
30+ years in web development is what you say at the support group to explain why you're there, not to convince people you've developed good taste and reasonable sensibilities.
Edit: Zed Shaw didn't know it at the time, but "Rails is a ghetto" wasn't describing even a local minimum in web development, it was the start of an incredible valley we've yet to see the bottom of. A sea of unskilled morons unable and unwilling to learn even the basics of just about everything came in droves and never left. Now they have bullshit generators that'll generate the shit code they probably were going to ship anyway, except faster.