> Dead silence. One person suggested WPF. Another said WinUI 3. A third asked if they should just use Electron. The meeting went sideways and we never did answer the question. > That silence is the story. These LLMs are just awful at writing.
Microsoft hasn't had a coherent GUI strategy since Petzold
21–30 of 604 posts
Re: Microsoft hasn't had a coherent GUI strategy since Petzold
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think Bill pretty much chilled out since he stepped down?
Yeah of course. He has nothing to do with Microsoft operations or strategy. But does he still use the products?
Re: Microsoft hasn't had a coherent GUI strategy since Petzold
#23Re: Microsoft hasn't had a coherent GUI strategy since Petzold
#24Having spent some time kicking around the Delphi space I got quite into WPF in 2007ish. By 2010 I had not just sworn off it, I'd sworn off Windows entirely. The constant stream of rug-pulls as one bit of MS managed to pull off a political heist over another and - oh no - yet another "latest and greatest" technology was effectively deprecated within 18 months of launch, invalidating all the effort you put in to stayin…
Re: Microsoft hasn't had a coherent GUI strategy since Petzold
#25Did they even try to make it look like the new context menus?
Re: Microsoft hasn't had a coherent GUI strategy since Petzold
#26Re: Microsoft hasn't had a coherent GUI strategy since Petzold
#27Re: Microsoft hasn't had a coherent GUI strategy since Petzold
#28They had something reasonably good in WinRT. They should have stuck to that. But Nadella came in, said Azure Cloud is the future and abandoned the Windows platform.
Re: Microsoft hasn't had a coherent GUI strategy since Petzold
#29Re: Microsoft hasn't had a coherent GUI strategy since Petzold
#30Today i still use C# with Windows.Forms. All my old knowledge is still usefull. People know how to use a Windows.Forms program.
Unreal that MS bet the farm in Windows on so many other turds instead of boring old WinForms/Win32.