Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs
51–60 of 262 posts
Re: Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs
#52What are the limitations of USB4/Thunderbolt compared with a regular PCIe slot?
Re: Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs
#53Re: Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs
#54I don't know how Apple has evaded regulatory scrutiny for their refusal to sign Nvidia's eGPU drivers since 2018.
Apple doesn’t have a monopoly in any market they are in.
Apple has a monopoly over the "M-chip" personal computer market. They have a monopoly over the iOS market with the app store. They have a monopoly over the driver market on macOS.
Like, Microsoft was found guilty of exploiting its monopoly for installing IE by default while still allowing other browser engines. On iOS, apple bundles safari by default and doesn't allow other browser engines.
If we apply the same standard that found MS a monopoly in the past, then Apple is obviously a monopoly, so at the very least I think it's fair to say that reasonable people can disagree about whether Apple is a monopoly or not.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Cor....
Re: Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs
#55Or I could have totally misunderstood the role of Docker in this.
Re: Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs
#56Re: Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs
#57Such a shame both companies are big on vanity to make great things happen. Imagine where you could run Mac hardware with nvidia on linux. It's all there, and closed walls are what's not allowing it to happen. That's what we as customers lose when we forego control of what we purchase to those that sold us the goods.
Don't purchase? I don't own any Apple devices, everything works fine.
The machine I'm using now represents my choices and matches what matters to me, and works closer to perfectly than all my machines in the past
And yes, I have worked with macs, and no, the UX and the entire tyranny in the Apple ecosystem was not something I could live with
And yes, this machine is fast, predictable, a joy to work with and is a tool I control, not a tool to control me. If something happens to it, I can order the part with the same price that goes into a new machine, and keep using my laptop
Re: Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs
#58Such a shame both companies are big on vanity to make great things happen. Imagine where you could run Mac hardware with nvidia on linux. It's all there, and closed walls are what's not allowing it to happen. That's what we as customers lose when we forego control of what we purchase to those that sold us the goods.
Don't purchase? I don't own any Apple devices, everything works fine.
Because of that, you need an apple device around to be able to deal with iMessage users.
Re: Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs
#59Why does Apple need to make the drivers in a walled garden? Atleast they should support major device categories with official drivers.
Isn't that the whole point of the walled garden, that they approve things? How could they aim and realize a walled garden without making things like that have to pass through them?
Re: Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple doesn’t have a monopoly in any market they are in.
It depends how you define the market. In the 2001 microsoft case [0], the courts ruled Microsoft had a monopoly over the "Intel-based personal computer market". Apple has a monopoly over the "M-chip" personal computer market. They have a monopoly over the iOS market with the app store. They have a monopoly over the driver market on macOS. Like, Microsoft was found guilty of exploiting its monopoly for installing IE b…